English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Just want to know what folks think, I think it was probably an inside job for sure.

2007-01-06 09:56:42 · 12 answers · asked by silverblack12345 5 in News & Events Other - News & Events

12 answers

I think it is obvious, to anyone with the slightest bit of curiosity who can look at analyses of events that day, the facts they show, and compare them with the official story we were then asked to believe, has to come to the conclusion that it was an inside job. I will mention the evidence which is the most compelling to me in a moment.

Ask yourself one question, who benifitted the most, and remember the power grabs that came out of the White House immediately after 9/11, and the well known neocon agenda of global dominance put into place thereafter, including invading Iraq, which was on the neocon agenda for years before 9/11. The propaganda used had many Americans believing that Iraq was somehow involved in 9/11, and 85% of troops in Iraq believed that's why they were there (source below), a testiment to military indoctrination techniques. Remember also that Bush used ground zero as a backdrop to his re-election campaign, milking the fear, with bogus 'terror alerts' and endless shrieking about "terrorists".

Back to 9/11, the most compelling evidence is the collapse of the WTC buildings. These fell straight down into their own footprints at nearly the speed of gravity. There was no resistance from the bottom floors as the top floors came down onto them, again, straight down at freefall speed. Furthermore, all of the concrete was pulverized into dust in mid-air before it even hit the ground. These features point to a controlled demolition with thousands of powerful, pre-placed explosives. The official collapse theory, caused by the impact and fires weakening the top floors is simply unbelievable, due to the fact that modern steel buildings have never collapsed as a result of fire, even when the fires were much bigger, hotter and longer lasting (Madrid fire of 2002). The WTC buildings were also designed to withstand multiple plane collisions of planes about the size of 767's, and the Commission lied when it said the center of those buildings were hollow: there were 47 massive steel columns there, and these were obviously also blown up - inndeed the entire steel structures have remained. A third building the WTC7 building (47 or 57 floors, don't remember exactly, but still pretty big) also came down the same way, and wasn't hit by any airplane. This building housed offices of FEMA, the FBI, CIA and mayor Gulliani.


According to a Zogby poll last year, 70 million American adults want a new, independent investigation on 9/11; so this is not some "fringe" group out there who distrusts. How is it that 40 or 50 million dollars were spent investigating the Lewinsky affair, and only about 600 thousand dollars investigating 9/11, the largest mass murder in America? Why on earth would Bush resist an investigation. He only agreed to one after much pressure, hand-picking the commission himself, stonewalling it much of the time, and testifying in private, not under oath.

"The Big Lie" theory goes that if you tell a lie big enough, everyone will believe you, because the average person, can't believe that anyone would tell a lie so big, and this is exactly what happened with 9/11. They have obviously fooled a lot of people for a long time, but not everybody.

2007-01-06 17:41:20 · answer #1 · answered by serge 2 · 0 0

I would recommend watching the Loose Change video, either on Google Video or on YouTube, and watching it. It's a long watch (over an hour), but what it does compile is a lot of points supporting the fact that 9/11 was an inside job.

At the very least, there is more to the 9/11 story then the government is letting on.

2007-01-06 10:31:29 · answer #2 · answered by Link 5 · 1 0

Five Israelis were caught near the twin towers laughing and celebrating during the attacksThey were filming the attacks and rejoicing. These Israelis when captured and interrogated said that our and your enemy is the same. There was also Israeli intelligence following Atta the 9/11 terrorist. It was very unusual for Israelis to be present near Atta.
Who really are the enemies of this nation thats the question. Enemies can also pose as friends.I know friends who are now married to their best friends wives.
What Thomas G is saying is exactly what the 5 Israelis captured near the twin towers said.
The consequences of 9/11, Americans are fighting the countries that Israel wanted to fight and it also gave Israel an excuse to attack and destroy Lebanon, one more time.

2007-01-06 10:06:03 · answer #3 · answered by observer 4 · 3 0

The voluminous evidence is crashing our computers. Just do a search for 9/11 Truth.

Now you all know why Bush is so persistent about keeping our military in Iraq and Afghanistan. This was the whole purpose of 9/11, to get a significant military presence in Eurasia for the purpose of stifling any challenge to our supremecy (and of course, to make sure China and other countries don't get access to "our" oil). The propaganda department of the U.S. military is the size of russia, so don't be fooled by their lies that don't...add up...

2007-01-06 10:15:54 · answer #4 · answered by protocols 2 · 1 1

I don't think it was.
Many claim it was created as excuse for Iraq War. But why didn't they plant more evidence in 911 that link Saddam directly to 911 if it was to be used as war execs. It was weak WMD case and eminent threat. And remember how many intelligence leaks were there about WMD? And all those gov insiders came out to criticize gov on WMD case? But not a single leak, single dissidents, single gov insider come out about '911 inside job'? If it is too perfect of a conspiracy, too good to be true it probably is. Like those weight loss pills you might believe really work.

Other weird 911 inside job claims include Pentagon being hit by missile. Cruise missile.
Hole on the side of Pentagon was seen about 20ft wide. It is because the wall was solid reinforced concrete and only the plane's nose(which is pointed) penetrated heavily reinforced solid concrete.
Let's look at Tomahawk cruise missile. It contains about 1000lbs of explosives. Would that leave hole only 20ft wide on side of Pentagon? And leave no bomb crater on the ground? Have you seen what bombs do to the ground when it hits?

911 inside jobs theory constanty label good information are simply 'main stream media' propaganda and controlled by government without properly disputing them. They're method is highly superficial and pseudo-scientific. There are lot of absurd claims like the one above.

2007-01-06 10:34:28 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

the certainty that 1000's of engineers and designers wrote letters to congress approximately how development 7 became made to with stand considered one of those ability and that fires itself would not be sufficient to fully give way the development in seconds, of direction those letters have been thoroughly exceeded over and anybody who questioned the respected government tale have been thrown out as in-compassionate Anti-American loons. it is impossible to question the 9/11 tragedy without being solid out as a Anti-American.

2016-10-30 04:44:58 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Not according to the 9/11 Commission Report! If anything the report says Clinton is more to blame. The terrorists came into this country during his presidency. They learned how to ram planes into buildings while Clinton was ramming Monica's mouth. The Commission report was bi-partisan and even had Jamie Gorelick, a member of Clinton's administration.

2007-01-06 10:02:42 · answer #7 · answered by Search4truth 4 · 3 2

I do not think the Bush Administration PLANNED it.

However, I believe the had the terms to prevent it from happening and therefore caused it by inaction due to the possible opportunities this would give them later on during the presidency.

2007-01-06 10:17:02 · answer #8 · answered by locomonohijo 4 · 0 0

No, it wasn't an "inside job". Terrorists had been attacking us before the current administration took office, and the attacks became bigger as time went on.
It's quite obvious that the Clinton administration's lack of action contributed a large part to the happenings of 9-11, however distasteful that fact is to the Bush haters.

And one more thing, these "conspiracy" websites sure do bring out the worst in a certain sector of our citizenry. It's easy to see that they truly want this to be something as horrible as our own government doing something like this.

2007-01-06 10:29:06 · answer #9 · answered by dave b 6 · 0 4

Osma Bin Landin and his group of nut job Radical Islamic Fundamentalist were solely responsible for 9/11

The stuff about Jews is sheer lunacy. Those of us who lived though that day here in New York are really offended by this talk that any one else did this but the people who did. You are playing into the hands of these enemies of our nation when you fall for silliness like that

2007-01-06 10:14:10 · answer #10 · answered by Thomas G 6 · 0 4

fedest.com, questions and answers