English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20070106144518AA4AV2g&r=w&pa=FZptHWf.BGRX3OFMhzxUUkiuKWEMp.NsDaFowUuw7oHgjQcKhFU._nnXseF6LkPIQXRMxhYgnry44STEqg--&paid=answered#QJYvWjbvBDXzfqZO2M8j6wam5tvFTqefnhepzBCWxyDVqzhny7Mf

2007-01-06 09:51:29 · 30 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

30 answers

Even though it's provocative, you raise an interesting question. On the aborting of babies most liberals don't consider them to be real children... if more of them were to see an ultrasound of say, an early 2nd trimester baby, perhaps they would think differently. The 1st part of your question is also interesting, I use to think that liberals really put the defense of freedom above all else. Sadly that is not true with many of them, the hardcore collectivist left places hatred of Bush above the defense of freedom and that's tragic. They excuse this by mentioning past relationships out of context ~(they are silent when confronted with all the news footage of Roosevelt and Stalin embracing and making nice)~ and without any historical prospective. It's a political shorthand that the casual liberal swallows easily. So you have a mindset that excuses going soft on Saddam because it both undermines, and fuels the rage against Bush

2007-01-06 12:47:11 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

I am liberal and Saddam is dead so he has no real feelings anymore. Although i don't agree it was right his people did what they decided with him so it has nothing to do with what i feel. Last time i checked it is only legal to have an abortion in a certain time frame and that is a time when the fetus could not live without the mothers body supporting it. And there is a huge debate about baby or fetus so you really can't say i don't care more about a baby then Saddam's feelings. I will never respect Bush he undermines everything this country was built on, we were supposed to be a free country where you could have any religion we wanted and not be punished or have to live by another religions rules. We now live by Christianity's rules

2007-01-06 09:59:35 · answer #2 · answered by Toxic Lette 3 · 8 3

I don't much care for either of those. Screw Saddam, but I want to know where the hell Osama is. As for aborting babies, I could never do it but I am pro-choice. And I do believe that Bush's priorities are a little backwards. The focus should be on our own country, and how to improve it. What's the point of building a 5 star education system in Iraq, when are own schools graduate illiterate people?

2007-01-06 09:58:21 · answer #3 · answered by MtnBlossom 3 · 8 1

Those who can, do
Those who cant, teach
It is a very large country with so many problems,
Can we fix all of them ? Maybe not right away we must start with the first one, but the problem we have, is there are so many in the country that need special treatment. lets stop all the politics
look at NewOrleans,
let's fix every home, replace every dock, church, and every Mosque in the state. when everything is all fixed up then start someplace else. dont bring up anything else until were done.
no congress on earth could ever fix everything, in America
We are the American voters we put them in there and they will do as we say.
or we will take them out.

2007-01-06 10:19:46 · answer #4 · answered by t-bone 5 · 5 0

If you are going to execute someone they do deserve to die with dignity. Even if he himself did not give any, there is no reason why we should lower ourselves to his level.

As for Mr. Bush, if you look at the Patriot Act, that allows warrant less searches and secret searches, which is a violation of the Fourth Amendment. And the Military Commissions Act of 2006 which allows him to define torture and arrest anyone as a unlawfully enemy combatant and hold them without charges violating the Bill of Rights again. And a blatant disregard of the FISA law with warrant less wiretaps. And now he wants to open your mail without a warrant anytime he feels like it violating the Fourth Amendment again. This man may have your respect, but he has done nothing at all to earn my respect. Until he starts upholding the oath he took before entering into office to support and defend the Constitution he will never get my respect.

2007-01-06 12:15:52 · answer #5 · answered by j 4 · 2 1

Saddam become a mundane Baathist. He did no longer prepare the Muslim faith. His 2 sons have been a pair of shameless psychopathic pigs! After his capture in spite of the shown fact that, he without notice stumbled on faith! via fact of this he and the religious zealot Osama bin encumbered ought to no longer have been buddies or allies. Saddam seen Osama a danger to his skill over the Iraqi human beings so there is not any way in hell that Al Qaeda ought to ever have been an entity working with Saddam or interior the borders of Iraq. We have been watching Saddam some distance too heavily for him to be covertly development a nuclear bomb or something for that rely. Our protection stress technique to extract Saddam ended up being like extracting one side from the middle of a stained glass window with a shotgun. we've indefinitely disrupted virtually each factor of Iraqi existence. we've shattered and scattered that which we've claimed we've been reason to rescue or save from Saddam. Over 2,000 medical doctors and nurses have been intentionally concentrated and murdered in Iraq. This has led to 18,000 extra medical doctors to flee Iraq in concern of their lives. Many greater nurses and wellbeing-care workers have fled the rustic in concern of their lives as properly. each time there are enormous casualties from a terrorist bomb in Iraq, there generally cases are not sufficient qualified scientific workers to offer the injured human beings the preliminary emergency therapy and persist with-up therapy they so desperately desire. Over a million and a a million/2 of the Iraqi expert classification have fled Iraq. those are the human beings maximum necessary to the energy of Iraq's financial gadget! Iraq become no longer a danger to the U.S. Germany and Japan have been! Liberals have never cherished Saddam and that they never have thought he become a sturdy factor for U.S. hobbies in that section like the conservatives did while he desperate to attack Iran. The 9-year conflict between Iraq and Iran did no longer serve the hobbies of the US one bit! We sided with Iraq and offered them a lot of "weapons of mass destruction" to apply against Iran. have you ever seen the image of Donald Rumsfeld smiling and shaking palms with Saddam Hussein? You did no longer see any liberals over there doing that!

2016-12-12 05:33:54 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Saddam is dead, I don't think he can feel that much right now. I'm against abortion, because as a Liberal I'm free to think and feel what I want......respecting YOUR president ? Never, because as a German , I don't need to :-P

2007-01-06 18:28:33 · answer #7 · answered by willow, the yodakitty from hell 7 · 0 0

Saddam was a murdering vile tyrant & deserved what he got. The Iraqi courts sentenced him & set the date - not the American government.

However his execution & the concern for his feelings is not a liberal vs. conservative thing & definetely has nothing to do with aborting babies or respecting our president. Please take a course in logic.

2007-01-06 10:31:23 · answer #8 · answered by Bad M 4 · 8 1

The only thing going through Saddam's mind right now are worms.

2007-01-06 09:55:59 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 15 2

I think the speedy hanging of Saddam was the right thing to do, he got Iraqi justice. Abortion is legal, and our President hasn't earned my respect, only the respect of the office. You're doing great to raise the level of discussions for someone who is sick of the crap on here.

2007-01-06 10:00:44 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 7 5

fedest.com, questions and answers