2007-01-06 08:52:33 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
That's right 'justgoodfolks' 2nd post.
Americans electricute people and give leathal injection instead!!! What's your point?
2007-01-06 09:01:35 · update #1
Is this a serious Q, or just a silly attempt at a provocative implication?
I can only answer with a Q of my own. Which would you rather live with? If you would honestly prefer one over the other, then your reasons for making that choice lie in the perceived differences between the two...to you.
If you can see no difference (as your Q seems to imply) you'd have to say that you'd be hard-pressed to choose between the two groups.
Is that what you want us to believe about you?
2007-01-07 15:09:40 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
They both believe in the idea of Purity. They both want to purify their countries, and throughout history, this has been one of mankind's most deadly concepts, having lead to many of the darkest periods in our history. Though a high aspiration of thought and belief, it is a mistake that has led to such purifications as the Inquisition, the Holocaust of Germany, the horrors of Pol Pot in Cambodia, and now the War on Terror. The mistake of this concept of Purity must be understood by mankind for what it is, and then transcended as we have with so many other mistaken ideas we have left behind. For either we are all God's Children, or our religions that teach otherwise are a lie.
2007-01-06 17:01:55 · answer #2 · answered by michaelsan 6 · 4⤊ 1⤋
A lot.One of them is that No American uses the tactic of shopping of heads.Was the first thing that came to mind.
Being against the death penalty always I can still see the difference between believing some people deserve the death penalty and beheading Innocent people just because they have the wrong religion and you want to scare and terrorize others by doing that.
2007-01-06 16:58:54 · answer #3 · answered by justgoodfolk 7 · 2⤊ 4⤋
No difference. Both have threatened the violent overthrow of this government. In November, the U.S. Christian Evangelicals reported in "Faith and Nation" that they advocate the violent overthrow of this government if their "holy" agenda and their so-called one - and - only - right - path - to - goodness is not made into legislation.
2007-01-06 17:21:52 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 3⤋
Our Fundamentalist have not been able to get our religion on our drivers license yet so they are less powerful.
2007-01-06 19:20:26 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
I think you should label them by the right name the Rethuglican Party and their President in denial George W. Bush.
2007-01-06 17:05:44 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 5⤋
Nothing. Both are wrong and both claim in the name of religion.
2007-01-06 17:08:06 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 4⤋
none , they fell from the same tree
2007-01-07 20:11:12 · answer #8 · answered by me 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
The name of the imaginary being they pray to.
2007-01-06 17:08:35 · answer #9 · answered by bettysdad 5 · 2⤊ 5⤋
None.
2007-01-06 17:02:13 · answer #10 · answered by Mysterio 6 · 2⤊ 3⤋