English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Year after year...there were no WMD's (yes...there were), BIG OIL 9give it a rest - Clinton gave Halliburton NO BID contracts in his admin), The rich don't pay taxes (I have a 6 figure tax bill to prove you wrong), neocon (can't take ANY question seriously when you guys call us that - sorry), etc, etc, etc...

Does it get as annoying having to say all those things constantly as it is annoying for us to have to listen to you?

2007-01-06 07:54:34 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

kissmy...I really don't care who believes me about my tax bill. It's a fact I have to live with... and I will never meet anyone from on here so I am certainly not trying to impress people I'll never meet.

2007-01-06 08:31:52 · update #1

KEN - we pay a lot in taxes and we are not RICH. Liberals say the rich should be taxed more - why - it punishes success and hard work. I am frustrated and that frustration came off as arrogance, which I assure you I am not.

2007-01-06 08:46:05 · update #2

22 answers

They can't help it, its genetic.

Norfolk, Va. - While the results of the research are preliminary, scientists at the Diminutive Male Genitalia Disorder Research Organization have discovered a genetic link between small penis size and the being liberal. The organization recently began to tabulate data from a two-year study of men with Diminutive Male Genitalia Disorder (DMGD) and has posted the results on its Web site, DMGD.org.

The subjects of the study varied from men with a slight abnormality in penis size to men with pubis innius, a term for an inverted male pubic region. By tracing what has been identified as the "DMGD gene," an abnormality in the 21st chromosome was discovered. Researchers found that this abnormality appears to be consistently linked to two traits: abnormally small male reproductive organs and the ability to derive joy from liberal activities, which starts with acting out in school and, in isolated instances, can manifest itself in homosexual acts. Research team leader Dr. Brad Uplurch and his colleagues in New Orleans, La., plan to investigate whether DMGD was a factor in making San Fransicko California the home of liberal indecency.

"These findings confirm what we have believed for a long time: Liberals just don't measure up." "They are apparently overcompensating for their failure to succeed in life by adopting deviant behaviors and delusional attitudes."

2007-01-06 09:07:18 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3 7

Uh, this is scary. You're right to be concerned about the media. I'd agree with that. It has been consolidated to the point where its all in the hands of a few, Disney, Turner, etc. They set the agenda and control what issues are salient. But to suggest the real danger is the liberalism of the media is simply crazy. It also completely ignores a basic tenant of America you neglected to mention - pluralism. Is it possible for you to comprehend other people have a different perspective and in some cases they may be right? The notion one side is pure while the other is evil is plain stupid. Helping nations in need? Is that what Vietnam was? How again did we help? Is that what Iraq is? The ONLY war we've ever waged for purely humanitarian reasons was launched by a liberal < Bill Clinton, when he went into Kosovo.

2016-05-22 23:40:46 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Here's what I get from your question/statement/rant. First and foremost, arrogance. No offense is meant to you personally, I don't know you. I'm just telling you what I feel when I read your question. Second thing is, you're ranting. You criticize others for saying neocon, and yet you start yours with Liberals. What's up with that? Aren't you throwing a slap at others immediately? Third, yes, it's gets very annoying instead of discussing what our government is actually doing. The last thing that comes to my mind is this, for some reason or other you felt the need to wave a supposed six figure tax statement in the face of everyone, like that makes you important, it doesn't, see reason one. Let's ask some real questions to each other. Thank you.

2007-01-06 08:41:38 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 6 0

I love this comment/question, because it is almost too easy to answer. --No sarcasm or cruelty necessary.

Look at your outstanding fellow neocons. Rush Limbaugh still makes hay griping about a president who hasn't been in office in 6 years. Not a day passes that he doesn't bring up this, apparently the only talking point your party and persuasion considers solid.

And you know what? It isn't solid. Not at all. There's no substantive way a thoughtful person can compare being serviced by an intern in the Oval Office to lying, starting a war, and killing 3,000 Americans in the process.

--Besides which, Clinton was then, this is now.

"Don't you ever get tired of the same talking points?"

Well, obviously, you neocons don't. Reruns have been very very good to you.

2007-01-06 08:28:53 · answer #4 · answered by £º$∑® 2 · 7 1

What sucks is look at all the big wigs getting into a war and with all the high-paid pro's they can't even figure what to do after 6 yrs. They(and this is not w/partisan look) have managed to : let planes get past our 'best' radar hit 'most' protected bldg; find bad guy; stay over anyway; thousands all sides dead; we loose a few more rights; US looks foolish and nations are turning against us. The bad part is they ARE our leaders. What happened to Pres G Washington , Pres Lincoln they wouldn't I hope dance with our foes for any reason.

2007-01-06 08:40:22 · answer #5 · answered by spareo1 4 · 1 1

MSNBC.com
Updated: 7:24 p.m. MT April 25, 2005
WASHINGTON - In his final word, the CIA’s top weapons inspector in Iraq said Monday that the hunt for weapons of mass destruction has “gone as far as feasible” and has found nothing, closing an investigation into the purported programs of Saddam Hussein that were used to justify the 2003 invasion.

This from John Dean-you know the Nixon attorney-Republican? President George W. Bush has got a very serious problem. Before asking Congress for a Joint Resolution authorizing the use of American military forces in Iraq, he made a number of unequivocal statements about the reason the United States needed to pursue the most radical actions any nation can undertake - acts of war against another nation.

Now it is clear that many of his statements appear to be false. In the past, Bush's White House has been very good at sweeping ugly issues like this under the carpet, and out of sight. But it is not clear that they will be able to make the question of what happened to Saddam Hussein's weapons of mass destruction (WMDs) go away - unless, perhaps, they start another war.

CNN
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- U.S. inspectors have ended their search for weapons of mass destruction in Iraq in recent weeks, a U.S. intelligence official told CNN.

The United States is taking steps to determine how it received erroneous intelligence that deposed Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein was developing and stockpiling nuclear, chemical and biological weapons, White House spokesman Scott McClellan said Wednesday.

BBC:
Iraq had no stockpiles of biological, chemical or nuclear weapons before last year's US-led invasion, the chief US weapons inspector has concluded.

This link is Bush's words from a press conference where he admits there were no weapons of mass destruction and Iraq is not connected to 9/11


http://usliberals.about.com/b/a/257723.htm

As to your tax problem, I've worked for financial planners and wealthy clients for years-have to say if you're paying 6 figures, you are either wealthy or not intelligent to hire a tax attorney. We had people with $500,000 gross that only paid taxes on $50k. Tax loopholes are for the rich.

2007-01-06 10:14:17 · answer #6 · answered by Middleclassandnotquiet 6 · 3 2

Yes, it is like a broken record. The name calling (on both sides) is getting very old. Let's work together to make America better. The constant hate, name calling, non issue's, slander, and lies is nothing more than an avoidance of the real issues and problems that we are faced with today.

2007-01-06 08:39:29 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

Certainly does all the whinging and carrying on about the same rubbish day after day must play on the minds of some.They must have a small realisation of whats going on in the real world.Same questions over and over I suppose they have to keep asking until they find someone with the same narrow minded point of view as them.

2007-01-06 08:48:58 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

I think it's time for you to grow up, and start taking responsibility. Your like a little child that will say anything to hurt someone else's feelings. Anybody that as read your questions/answers knows that your a spoiled brat that is too immature to be objective. It disturbs me that you have children. They don't have a chance.

2007-01-07 07:18:37 · answer #9 · answered by Count Acumen 5 · 1 0

I would like to beleive you, but the part of the 6 figure tax bill makes it hard to do!! Writing this question must have cost $50,000 in time!

2007-01-06 08:22:19 · answer #10 · answered by Anarchy99 7 · 8 0

show proof of real WMDs. i doubt you pay a six figure tax bill but theat is the beauty of the internet for some. you can claim to be anything. neocons are a real group,get educated. you make absurd claims without proof. which seems to be the norm here. do you tire of lying and talking the same smack?

2007-01-06 08:11:23 · answer #11 · answered by kissmy 4 · 11 1

fedest.com, questions and answers