Yes, I do believe justice was made.
2007-01-06 07:51:56
·
answer #1
·
answered by redsox6391 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
In a country like Iraq where the death penalty for killing is accepted by law, and a person like Saddam is unquestionably proved to have killed hundreds of innocent persons beyond any doubt.
Forgeting the seudo hippie bla bla bla, did he order the killings? yes, there was a document with his signature ordering it. That´s the end of the line, .
All else is irrelevant.
So, there is no other option left but the rope.
Not executing him, would go against the law and against the principle that all are equal under the law.
Jose Pizarro
Lima - Peru
2007-01-06 16:51:07
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Ademar:
If your really serious about obtaining a clear answer to your question, you must be skilled in world history, with focused
attention on the Middle East.
Iraq is next to a giant quagmire of religious differences, namely
Iran, and its population of 69 million souls.
Until the western world can tone down the intentions of Iran,
and its president, we will be stuck with further atrocities committed against the west (Israel and the United States)
For 2,500 years, the Middle East has been nothing but a cauldron of blood and conquest, dating clear back to
Cyrus the conquerer.
One tribe after another has conquered most of the cities in
the Sunni Triangle, and each tribe left its mark, in the form of
increased numbers of Muslims (followers of Islam)
At present, you have the Kurds from the north, who are
constantly re-positioning themselves for Islamic recognition,
the Shiites or Shias, who claim to be the true Muslim (follower
to Allah) and the Sunnis, who also claim their ways are the true
ways, and mix it all together, and you have these jihads (holy war)
And you have the Palestine/Israeli confrontations, latest
Southern Lebanon, in which the Hezbollah (from Iran through
Syria) supported the warfare against Israel.
Now you have the United States along with its allies(what's
left of them) prosecuting an undeclared US war, against the
Islamo-Marxists-faschists radicals (jihadists) to remove them
from doing any more harm to the Iraqi innocents, and establish
a democratic form of government for Iraq to follow.
While President Bush's idea is good, its also an ideal that can never be achieved in this lifetime.
Its a cultural war, not a beachhead war, which means winning this war could take decades, and hundreds of billions of dollars
and the loss of many US military lives, along with some civilian
contractors.
Now as far as justice being served with the execution of Saddam
Hussein? He stood for all those that he executed before his overthrow, and his execution is now for all the Iraqi people
to share, if they are anti-Hussein.
Rememer, he killed off millions of Shiias, as Hussein himself was a secular Sunni.
Justice won't be served until all the Islamo-fascists are run out or killed off from the Sunni Triangle, and I don't see that happening anytime soon.
There are still cells of the al-Qaeda imbedded over there, and now
some are imbedded in the US of A as well.
It will go on being a sore spot for the west to deal with in the years to come, as the al-Qaeda have sworn a jihad against all
infidels who live in the western world, including Israel and the
United States.
Thats my message, good luck.
Donald H. Sites
sueanddon350@sbcglobal.net
2007-01-06 16:38:19
·
answer #3
·
answered by sueanddon350@sbcglobal.net 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
His trial was rushed through an illegal court & his execution sped up , before he could say anything that would embarress Washington or London.
With the death of Saddam Hussen, it is time to reflect on what has brought us to this time.
The U.S. is responsible for many of the problems we face today. It put Saddam in power to counter Soviet influence in Iraq. It drove the insurgents from Afghanistan, then left, allowing them to return; now we are in a battle to remove them again.
These are examples of U.S. political interference in other sovereign nations to suit its agenda. It is not charged for these interferences. Why? The countries that it interferes with are the ones that suffer, not the U.S.
2007-01-06 16:52:51
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I Think It Was In Some Ways And In Others No.It Doesn't Change Or Bring Back Any Of The People He Had Killed Or Killed Myself However He Can't Hurt Anymore People..
2007-01-06 16:31:23
·
answer #5
·
answered by amber 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
i don't think so. the big shots who played a part in bringing him down should have been tried too in the rooms of justice, after all, it is alleged that they have sinned against humanity too.
Sadam was punished by might, and not by justice-seeking morals.
2007-01-06 15:56:44
·
answer #6
·
answered by just me.. 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
There's no doubt the world is a better place without him....after the 30 years or so that he oppressed his people killing women, children etc....i'd say it's justice...
2007-01-06 15:51:23
·
answer #7
·
answered by Rob 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
Justice was served, but it didn't change anything in the real world. His death did not take back the thousands he was responsible for. I'm sure the kurds would tell you that.
2007-01-06 15:51:09
·
answer #8
·
answered by premise 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
sadam was an evil man responsible for many deaths, and brought its country to its knees. anyone who purposefully mass murders and defiantly shows no remorse for their despicable crimes deserves the 'death penalty'. YES it was justified.
2007-01-06 15:54:47
·
answer #9
·
answered by emzc 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
no one should have the right to take a life no matter how bad that person is. 2 wrongs dont make a right i think he should have been jailed.
2007-01-06 16:31:13
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋