Capital gains takes are much lower than personal income tax, shifting the tax burden to the middle and lower classes.
Corporations are subsidized. Bankruptcy protections for when the wealthy make errors are paid for by the public.
Wars are waged by the wealthy for economic reasons and paid for by the public in life and treasure.
Bank failures resulting from speculation by the wealthy are paid for by the general public.
It seems, if you take a step back, that the rich enjoy a sort of Socialism here in America, where blunders are cleaned up through taxation of the general public. The result of this is social support for wealth.
Do you agree and if so isn't it ironic that wealthy Republicans love to paint others as liberals with Socialist or even Communist leanings?
2007-01-06
07:33:33
·
5 answers
·
asked by
Murphy
3
in
Social Science
➔ Economics
Trickwo, see your challenge there. I did a study recently on a different topic -- wealth concentration at the top -- with data from BLS. Send me your e-mail at brian.t.murphy@sbcglobal.net and I will send it to you.
Some of my points I consider common knowledge and no data needed. For example, I do not believe any intelligent and rational person would argue that wars are not waged for economic reasons. War is terribly costly. It had BETTER be waged for economic benefit. But, my point is about who pays, not about the justification.
That capital gains tax is lower than income tax is an obvious fact. What data are you looking for there?
That the federal government subsidizes large corporations is also an obvious fact. Maybe you want details about the industry breakout and magnitude?
Please remember: there is a difference between claiming there is no data and dismissing data and facts that are inconvenient to your position.
2007-01-06
08:38:29 ·
update #1