The way I see it, the war on terror is a COMPLETE FARCE. 9/11 was DEFINITELY an inside job and I am SICK of being told I dishonor the lives lost on 9/11 when I do my part to expose the greatest display of treason in the history of the USA.
I believe the lives lost on 9/11 are continually dishonored by Bush, his staff, those in govt that go along with the 9/11 farce and all Bush supporters who refuse to do any research into Bush's credibility.
What do you think?
2007-01-06 07:27:46 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
For someone NOT to expose the truth would be a dishonor. We need more people to see and prove that our government is a bunch of corrupt, lying, bast***s.
2007-01-06 12:05:25 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Whether or not it was an inside job (republicans cannot prove it wasn't, but likewise it cannot be proven it was), the "War on Terror" is a complete farce today. Halliburton in Iraq is disgraceful, leeching oil profits off the Iraqi people for our government's fattened wallets.
Oh, while we are on the subject of dishonoring the troops, do you remember when our president referred to this war (and thus, the rigorous work of our fine men and women in the military) merely a "comma in history"? Our president NEEDS to apologize for that.
Fourth answerer, why would we take a KKK member seriously, such as yourself?
2007-01-06 07:30:59 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
The deceased are dishonored when their names and memories are used as an excuse for unwarranted aggression, for torture, for the dismantling of democracy, and the deaths of innocent people.
If the war on terror was an actual attempt to ensure that we never have another 9/11 style attack ever again, then it would not dishonor the dead. But since it's being used as an excuse to commit dishonorable acts, it does dishonor the dead.
2007-01-06 07:33:34 · answer #3 · answered by some_guy_times_50 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
perhaps one might desire to make certain in what context Iraq is a warfare. iraq is an occupied u . s .. Occupied worldwide places usually rally a resistence with the aid of their human beings against their occupiers. in this context how precisely does the international 'terrorist' slot in? have been the French resistence in WWII terrorists because of the fact they battled the Germans who occupied their u . s .? of direction many s**t disturbers have pored into Iraq which became best for civil and non secular strife if anybody ever broke down the as quickly as element that united the human beings of that u . s . - worry of their repressive government. Iraq is helpful to interrupt into countless countries with Iran rising as an area ability and the actual winner of this 'experience'. to attempt to be so black and white and say they are terrorists who 'hate freedom' is undeniable stupid...they see this warfare as a conflict for his or her very own freedom that's an incredible irony.
2016-10-30 04:32:56 · answer #4 · answered by dembinski 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, it's when people like you talk the way you do that dishonors their memory. They didn't have to go and they are still going, so why don't you go to the front line and ask one of them the same question you asked us?
2007-01-06 09:10:24 · answer #5 · answered by Brianne 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
let's call ourselves...
"TRUTH AMBASSADORS"
glad to meet another embassy official.
keep up the good work... maybe more and more people will start to examine the truth.
2007-01-06 07:37:35 · answer #6 · answered by lovefights 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You will think whatever pleases you, no matter how (bleep)ing stupid it is.
2007-01-06 07:41:27 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋