If english terrorist attack usa will usa attack England?

Question

If American terrorist attack Russia will Russia attack usa?

and if they did will this be fair

is Bush right when atack Arab using 11/9 events

Answer 1

Sounds like a fair question, but I can't answer for the "Decider", we'll have to wait and see ....if and when....

Answer 2

I think I see where you're coming from. Afghanistan was bombed into oblivion because it's a known country to have protected terrorists. The affected areas where under Taliban control. Now, if there was a single Russian or English terrorist, this wouldn't happen unless an entire village or city protected said terrorist, and only after approval from the central government of either country. North New York (where Tim McVeigh was born) didn't get bombed after Oklahoma, right?

Answer 3

Ultimately we are all responsible for our own choices. They chose to do what they did flying those planes into the towers so ultimately they are responsible, the united states didn't force them to do anything and that's a fact. However we chose to send two countries back to the stone age in the aftermath and that was our governments choice (and ultimately ours since our govt is representative of the people in the eyes of the world.) everyone must be responsible for there actions because who knows how it will change the future. Who started what first is not the point the point is if we can change what is for the better, try to do the noble thing and forgive the past never forget lest we make the same mistakes again but forgive it. Give another chance and if that is taken for granted then there is an answer to that to.Some men just want to watch the world burn and so they must be responded to appropriately.

Answer 4

An English terrorist did try to attack the US- Richard Reid remember?England is a close ally, so in short no. I suppose it would have to depend on the circumstances-that's a very general question. No I do not agree with the strategy of "fighting terrorism" the way it's being carried out.

Answer 5

england is a friend, not a terrorist sponsor, so there would be no reprisals. the same is true with russia.
bush attacked the afghans and iraqis because he was a fool, not a great war president. he hasa mi-msnaged everything so far, so he's still a fool, and a lousy war leader.
nothing he will do will ever change that.
he's so full of his own self-importance that he thinks he knows best, which he doesn't.
he had NO qaulifications to be president, and hasn't learned from anything he's done so far, and won't from anything he's going to do.
his only qualifications for president were his financial backers and the greed they represent.

Answer 6

The Irish in the states have been sponcering attacks against England for years threw the IRA.But if the english were to supply cash for the american indians in an uprising...the boo-hooing would never stop.

Answer 7

most of those involved in the 9/11 attacks were saudi arabian.

bin laden is saudi born.

there are saudi billionares who to this day, deposit millions directly into the bank accounts of known terror groups and then sue the journalists that report this fact.

even the leader of the chechyn rebels is saudi born.

attacking iraq had absolutely nothing to do with 9/11 and only illustrates how corrupt the bush admin is...

Answer 8

If it came from the royal family i dont see why not. if it was a group, then im sure england would help fight them.

Answer 9

If we get attacked, no matter who did it, we will attack back.

Answer 10

no need, we're such great allies that Tony Blair would gladly get our troops to shoot themselves