History Help PLZ....Multiple Choice!!!?

Question

1 - A European peasant would find homesteading inviting because:
a - you would become a land owner with little effect or money.
b - land could bring instant wealth.
c - with hard work is was possible to own land.
d - there was political unrest in Europe.

2 - An advantage of buying land from a railroad as opposed to homesteading would be:
a -the railroad provided better loan terms.
b -railroads were fairer because there was a lot of corruption in the Homestead Program.
c - being near a railroad could provide a better way to sell farm products.
d - a homestead was often more land than 1 person or family could handle, whereas 1 could buy just what they needed from railroads.

3 - Corruption among Reconstruction Governments:
a -was much worse in the South.
b -did not occur except in South Carolina and Florida.
c -was more common in the West than in the North.
d -was certainly no worse than anywere else in the country at the time.

10 Points for Best Answer. Thank you!

Answer 1

1= C
2= C
3= A

:)

Answer 2

Here's the best i can do for you:
Question 1 can be answered by both "a" and "d". Remember these were PEASANTS and would have been treated little better than slaves when working in the europeen seigneurial system! They wouldn't have had the chance to own much of anything, much less their very own land. Coming to North America gave them a chance at a new life. The political unrest in europe at the time resulted in many of these peasants being driven from their homes.]

Question 2 i THINK is best answered with "c". Railroad provided transportation for products AND people! Often towns would settle around the rail line, making business more accessible for farmers.

As for Question 3.... i really don't know.

Answer 3

1. a
2. c
3. a

Answer 4

virtually each rape isn't seen to be a "violent" rape. meaning that the suspect wasn't some stranger who attacked, overpowered, and raped the sufferer, however the sufferer and the suspect have been friends or friends. One stated it became rape. the different stated "What?!?" quickly, human beings nevertheless have confidence that ladies folk are people who make the determination to have intercourse - not the adult adult males. the final thought is that the guy might have intercourse with anybody who became prepared (not asserting that I agree, yet i think of you would be mendacity to your self in case you probably did not agree maximum human beings this this form). If a women folk has intercourse with fairly some adult adult males, then she in all probability may well be prepared to have intercourse with the guy she's claiming to rape her. If she in no way has intercourse with anybody, she in all probability would not have been. installation the alleged sufferer as a female with questionable morals will make the guy's tale lots greater attainable. interior the he stated, she stated situations, there might desire to be credibility wide-unfold on the two factors (not basically the girls). the challenge with your point of view is which you're entering into there assuming the guy is to blame, and that the female became raped. The regulation is "harmless until shown to blame." look into what you typed: "So what? If a woman is a virgin, being raped is a lot greater poor and the rapist merits to be punished greater so than if the girl has had intercourse until now?! Or in case you do not gown like a nun, then you definately might desire to've been premier the guy on and sh*t?! Or if a woman gets inebriated, she's responsible for her very own rape?! No ask your self rape is the main under reported crime! i would not record a rape if I new i may well be made to look as though a terrible disgusting sl*t for it." think of roughly that attitude - you're implying that the female became certainly raped, that would or won't be the case. that may not how the courts are "meant" to artwork. Being raped is poor no remember who you're or what your previous became. besides the shown fact that, installation the credibility of your shopper, and the lackthereof of the defendent is going to circulate a protracted way. Who might you think greater? An harmless virgin asserting some jerk with a much greater promiscuous previous raped her? Or some female who's slept with dozens of adult adult males asserting that this one "took income" of her? The virgin is only lots greater attainable.

Answer 5

I often spend my half an hour to read this blog's posts daily along with a mug of coffee.

Answer 6

In the time it took you to post this question, you could have found the answers yourself.

Answer 7

I can't answer your questions, but I can't point you to where you can find out:

Answer 8

Not really sure