2007-01-06 06:31:44 · 18 answers · asked by bigcurriemusic 1 in Sports ➔ Basketball
not at all
2007-01-06 06:33:19 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The question isn't should the Bulls trade Gordon for Garnett it's should the Wolves trade Garnett for Gordon. Any GM in their right mind is going to give up a player like Gordon for a perennial All-Star and future hall of famer in KG. Putting KG with Hinrich and Ben Wallace is a formula for a path straight to the NBA Championship. The Bulls will never get their without a move of some sort, but they are nevertheless a good and much improved basketball team, so I can see a deep run into the playoffs
2007-01-06 07:30:23 · answer #2 · answered by cthomp99 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Even If the bulls wanted to get garnett Travis is right. Theres no way that garnett can be traded with just Ben Gordon. your going to need alot more then just gordon to trade for garnett. So I would have to say that it would be a bad trade for Chicago, because If Bulls give up all those players Garnett ends up probably in a worse team then he is now and chicago will not be winning games. and Minnessotta will be winning games and with the bulls players; and chicago would be spending alot more money if not the same amount and for one player which probably wont leave salary cap to build around garnett for a long time.
2007-01-06 07:25:56 · answer #3 · answered by pnutbutter25 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bulls would have to give up a lot more players than Gordon ($3,862,080) to get Garnett ($21,000,000). In the NBA the money has to match on a trade. The Bulls would have to give up half the team, as only Wallace($16mil) and Brown ($8mil) make more than Gordon, to match Garnett's salary.
2007-01-06 07:08:09 · answer #4 · answered by Travis W 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's going to take more than just Gordon to get Garnett.
2007-01-06 07:31:09 · answer #5 · answered by Stealing Home 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
LMAO!
Gordon for Garnett? is that a joke?
Gordon is no where near Garnett's level, lmao.
All these idiots going "yeah, yeah, that would be a great trade!"
2007-01-06 14:45:17 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Out of those 2, actual KG. Kobe's a maximum cancers anyhow, the NBA version of Alex Rodriguez. The Bulls already have sufficient shooters interior the backcourt. undecided what Chicago could supply up however to get the two.
2016-12-12 05:28:49 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No way! The Bulls have momentum now, and that would ruin everything, in spite of Garnett's greatness.
2007-01-06 07:02:01 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
More like, should the Timberwolves trade Garnett for Gordona and two other players. No.
2007-01-06 09:02:00 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
dont think so...garnetts comng off a good season and gordon is different. i suget maybe gordon and some other guy (prefferably good) and trade for KG....my opinion...well. yea
2007-01-06 06:34:29 · answer #10 · answered by Sammy; 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no they already have ben wallace watz the point of 2 good tall guys they should keep gordon
2007-01-06 06:36:11 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋