Do you think are next leader of this country should come from a blue collier back ground, One that has been in and amidst the masses? Who really knows what this country needs?
2007-01-06 06:13:56 · 9 answers · asked by sabinskip 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
As long as he's not from Texas, I'll be happy.
2007-01-06 06:16:08 · answer #1 · answered by ? 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Totally. I think that people who run for office and have a background of being humble, being a worker, helping the poor, needy and old people and also know what it is to live in the jungle is the ideal candidate for the average Joe like you or me. These candidates really know what we need. If a candidate had a bad childhood, had a mentally ill family member or had to go hungry for many years, he/she knows what it is. We've always been expecting this, we'll find the ideal candidate sooner than we expect!
2007-01-06 10:44:33 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
That would be good but it is not likely, and even if it is the case the power elite will make that person's term in office a living hell.
Just think what they did to our last blue collar President Bill Clinton, who many people forget was born to a single welfare mother and dragged himself up from poverty
2007-01-06 10:04:16 · answer #3 · answered by Thomas G 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think "Joe Schmoe" from the sticks with no political agenda and no affiliations will be the best President! Quit making it all about money and get a leader in office that cares about America!
2007-01-06 14:38:41 · answer #4 · answered by Kimberly M 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the subsequent president ought to have confidence in u . s . of america and it somewhat is protection. we desire somebody that could tell the generals and admirals to submit or close up and get out of ways. Too undesirable Patton has been ineffective for see you later. Him or MacArthur could have dealt with issues. we've a gaggle of generals and admirals that have gained their rank with the aid of political contacts and shouldn't additionally be there. Our everybody is giving their lives whilst the celebrities in Washington play board video games and circumvent politicians. speaking approximately chickening out or giving up isn't a distinctive function that qualifies somebody for the final place of work interior the rustic. forget the applicants only enable them to all understand that giving up isn't how this usa grew to become into geared up. finding a thank you to victory is what it somewhat is all approximately. Like Patton pronounced" get the job performed or flow aside for somebody which will". those ideals are what politicians ought to be exhibiting.
2016-11-27 00:07:20 · answer #5 · answered by maragni 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
John Edward's worked in the mills in South Carolina, as his father did. He doesn't just talk, he's been down in New Orleans helping homeowners since last year, and he started the One America foundation to get volunteers to help out. johnedwards.com
2007-01-06 06:33:37 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I agree with you. Our forefathers were mostly farmers or ran plantations or country stores. They were from the people. After they did their duty for the country they went home to reap their harvests or sell their goods
We are still basically following their rules (the constitution).
2007-01-06 06:24:19 · answer #7 · answered by madisonian51 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
How about a man of God , One like King David who will turn the whole country to God and let God fight the battles?
2 Chr 7:14
14 "if My people who are called by My name will humble themselves, and pray and seek My face, and turn from their wicked ways, then I will hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin and heal their land.
(NKJ)
2007-01-06 16:01:35 · answer #8 · answered by Chessman57 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
John Edwards is an ambulance chaser.
2007-01-06 07:12:18 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋