English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

6 answers

I don't have any preference. I wouldn't be shocked to see an uncircumcised male - after all, isn't that what penises are meant to look like?

2007-01-06 15:15:18 · answer #1 · answered by Girl Machine 7 · 2 0

I'm an uncircumcised man,and proudly admit it. As far as my own personal experience is concerned regarding girl's reactions when it's their first time.....I have been quite pleasantly surprised. Either I have had experiences with well-informed, well-educated, and open-minded women or there is a change in attitudes overall regarding a man's natural state. In each of the experiences, the curiousity, and the interest of discovery on the part of the women has been unbelievable. It has in certain terms become a new, fun plaything for them......something extra to enjoy.
Considering I grew up with a bad complex about being uncircumcised after having been teased about it as a boy.......I almost made the decision to get snipped.....just so I could fit in or be considered acceptable. In the end I realized that I didn't need to fit into anybody's mold or be acceptable to a particular groupof people......I decided it was better to be original, Unique! It has been a great experience for me personally, and I'm glad I decided to remain a Natural Uncircumcised Man!
I'm certain that there are plenty of women, particularly in the U.S. who prefer a circumcised men.....and that's ok by me, I respect preference, and I believe we all have a right to choose. But for me.......so far it's been a good thing, and the women I have been intimate with have been more than enthusiastic about the differences and the fact that there is an alternative!
Best of Luck!

2007-01-08 02:02:50 · answer #2 · answered by Ralph 4 · 0 0

I vastly prefer a natural (uncircumcised) penis. The action is smoother and silkier, and the man enjoys the whole thing so much more that I get pleasure from his pleasure. I really don't understand why anyone would mutilate a poor baby - that is so gross! It looks kind of pathetic when a man has no skin there, and he'll never give/get the sexual pleasure that a whole man would.

I'm no longer "shopping" for men, having married an intact man, but in the old dating days I think I would have been more shocked to see a man who had been cut. I would have loved my husband regardless, but I'm very grateful that his parents bucked the then-fashion and left him whole.

2007-01-06 15:32:11 · answer #3 · answered by Maple 7 · 2 3

CIRCUMCISED definitely.


Most women prefer a man with a circumcised penis because it may move inside them in a less friction-based manner. Once he is inside the vagina, the circumcised penis may easily slide up and down to create pleasure for both partners.

There are several advantages for circumcised men when it comes to sexuality. First is that circumcised male have no need to worry about daily cleansing of his foreskin. Meanwhile, men with an uncircumcised foreskin must take special care to move it up and down and clean it inside its covered areas to avoid odors or serious infection because of material buildup. Consequently, there might be some bacteria and germs that could surface thus affect their sexual health.

Safe sex is an added concern for uncircumcised men and their partners. Men with foreskins occasionally have difficulty finding the right condom or keeping one on during penetrative sexual activity. That spells trouble in bed as well as generates unneeded anxiety.

As for the sensitivity of the penis, no medical or physiological study has proved that circumcision reduces sensitivity, opposed to common belief. It is completely FALSE that circumcision reduces penis sensitivity. The American Academy of Paediatrics (AAP) confirms this on their web site; have a look at: http://www.aap.org/pubed/zzzjzmemh4c.htm

Several studies carried out by prestigious research bodies have concluded that uncircumcised penises are more prone to infections and contraction of STD's, including AIDS-HIV. Circumcised men have been proved to be up 70% less likely to be infected than those who are uncircumcised. Have a look at this site: http://www.torontodailynews.com/index.php/HealthNews/2006121404Circumcision

As for women, studies also show that circumcision also protects female partners from AIDS-HIV and other STD's. Browse this article: http://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/Press_releases/2006/02_08_06.html

Circumcision is an easy and nowadays painless procedure, which has many benefits, and virtually no risks.

Circumcision is NOT an amputation. Circumcision is NOT comparable at all to female circumcision, which is something completely different.

Circumcision rates are INCREASING nowadays, both in the United States and overseas. Many African and South American countries with little circumcision tradition are starting to promote the procedure to help to reduce the AIDS-HIV infection rates.

2007-01-07 13:02:11 · answer #4 · answered by Scuba 3 · 0 3

While I am in the minority, I happen to prefer uncircumsized males. I just find that there's more to play with, and sexual activity is therefore more fun...
Presuming that you live in the States, or really North America in general, women will usually be surprised at your uncircumsized state. However, if you were to go to Europe, you'd find that circumsized men are th eminority there, and that standards are reversed in many of the countries over there. People tend to be attracted to what their societies call "the norm"... but don't worry about it, anyone can learn to love your bits if they care about you; particularly if you use them well. ;)

2007-01-06 14:14:12 · answer #5 · answered by ATumorNamedMarla 4 · 3 2

My husband has not been circumcised. In the past when I was single, I never really thought about it much. It was just a penis.

2007-01-06 17:18:27 · answer #6 · answered by ? 6 · 1 2

fedest.com, questions and answers