For example, I am a vegetarian, a Chinese. Once people know that I am a vegetarian, they will ask why (because of belief? or what's the philosophy behind?). I just think it is natural that people are foodie, then why can't it be natural that I am vegetarian?
Why minorities need reasoning to support their stands but majority doesn't?
2007-01-06
05:16:41
·
6 answers
·
asked by
Marco
2
in
Arts & Humanities
➔ Philosophy
For example, I am a vegetarian, a Chinese. Once people know that I am a vegetarian, they will ask why (because of belief? or what's the philosophy behind?). I just think it is natural that people are foodie, then why can't it be natural that I am vegetarian?
Why minorities need reasoning to support their stands but majority doesn't?
[I am sorry that I may misdirect some kindly answerer by giving an example. My question focus is why people ask 'why' usually won't ask 'why not' as well. Such as you may ask why a news absent in one newspaper but not why a news present in another newspaper. Do you think this is a kind of bias?]
2007-01-06
06:09:05 ·
update #1