I think we should help the Venezuleans like we are helping Iraqis. Hugo Chavez is a brutal dictator he is so evil even Pat Robertson said this man must die. George W Bush who is like the modern Gandhi said this guy is evil and is bad news. I also know a Venezulean who wants America to invade his country because he hates Chavez.
2007-01-06 04:53:08 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Dictator? He is an elected official. Hardly and using Pat Robertson for reference is almost as ludicrous as using Bush. Do your research, one guy does not make a population. I know several, business owners, by the way, who like Chavez.
2007-01-06 04:55:34 · answer #1 · answered by Jimfix 5 · 3⤊ 2⤋
NO, Actually Hugo Chavez is EXTREMELY popular amongst the poor in Venezuela, he has used the money from his oil to better the conditions of the poor. He is not creating palaces after palaces with the money like Saddam. He is not a dictator he was elected by the people and not even the United States could find a problem with the election results unlike the election results in Iraq during saddam(which of course were rigged)
2007-01-06 12:54:31 · answer #2 · answered by fl_lopez 3 · 3⤊ 2⤋
No,not yet.And although Chavez is a dictator,his brutality is not even in the same league as Saddams was.And Pat Robertson is an irresponsible fanatic who does not have enough sense to think before he speaks.
2007-01-06 12:57:22 · answer #3 · answered by Mr Bellows 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
No I don't think we should invade anymore countries. But what about Chavez sending troops to Bolivia Should he be sending his military into Bolivia
I hope GW doesn't ask his father George (Louis the XIV) Bush for any advice or will be invading Bolivia
2007-01-06 13:04:53 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
No. George Bush is an anti-Gandhi by the way. George Bush is a war monger. The Iraq invasion has not freed anyone. In the end, Iraq is likely to be ruled by a Shia fundamentalist cult allied with Iran meaning that secular and non-Shia residents of Iraq will have rights denied as rights were denied under Saddam. The big accomplishment is that the U.S. is in debt that will take decades to resolve if ever. An invasion of Venezuela would be a similar disaster with thousands of Venezuelans killed along with hundreds or maybe thousand more young Americans killed.
2007-01-06 12:58:56 · answer #5 · answered by colefinch 2 · 0⤊ 4⤋
If i put my money on i would bet that he rigs the elections. A better solution to getting rid of chavez is to shut down every citgo gas station since they are owned by venezuela. that country would go so broke it would tear itself apart then we could go in and clean up the place.
2007-01-08 04:37:44 · answer #6 · answered by sivart 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Chavez is a real pain in the rear but that requires too much manpower. We will just have to let the CIA do it.
2007-01-06 12:58:34 · answer #7 · answered by C B 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Chavez was not "legitmately" elected. You cannot have a "legitimate" election south of the border! Their elections make ours look 100% a-ok, which they are not! So you can imagine the corruption down there. Chavez is a Castro. Let them all suffer. Remember, if they are free more of our jobs in the USA get lost! I wish China was anti-capitalist so we could have our jobs back. I do not want to capitalize the world. We will suffer in the end.
2007-01-06 13:35:15 · answer #8 · answered by david m 5 · 0⤊ 3⤋
No. But assassinating Chavez sure would make a cool spy movie.
2007-01-06 13:09:12 · answer #9 · answered by The Reaganite 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Hugo Chavez was legitimately elected by the Venezuelan people twice. When our own president wasn't even legitimately elected in 2000, we can't complain about their system.
2007-01-06 13:16:01 · answer #10 · answered by Owen 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋