The small edge you get with a composite stick isn't worth the 'breakability' factor. Unless you are a well-paid pro, they're too expensive too. Nothing wrong with a wood stick.
2007-01-06 06:10:24
·
answer #1
·
answered by megalomaniac 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
I'm a goaltender who also plays out/coaches on occasion. In goal I like to use composite, at least for now. Comparing the life of my current composite stick(Reebok, 7months and counting) to my past wooden stick (Nike Bauer, 5 months and almost in pieces). Composite is also much lighter, which I find nice. The price is also just about the same, to be honest. All somewhere near $100US. My only complaint about the composite is now a piece apparently chipped off inside and it rattles occasionally. Playing out...I wouldn't mind a composite stick, but they're not in my budget. I can run to Dick's Sporting Goods and buy a wooden stick for less than $20US and that will last me quite a while. The biggest problem I see with composite is price and chipping/breaking. Financially, I think going with wooden is much more beneficial.
2016-05-22 23:10:44
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I prefer wood sticks, composite are just so easy to break.
2007-01-06 05:00:38
·
answer #3
·
answered by cubsjunkie 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Actually now i like wood sticks..other types of sticks are weightless and it feels weird to hold them and handle the puck with them
2007-01-06 09:12:29
·
answer #4
·
answered by Ohkay 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
If you are a beginner, i would suggest a wood stick, as you get better i would go to a composite one
2007-01-06 05:21:27
·
answer #5
·
answered by ox3ashleyyy 2
·
0⤊
2⤋
wood
better feel of the puck
2007-01-06 11:22:01
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I play with Sherwood 5030 featherlites. Love 'em. (Wood.)
2007-01-06 11:47:48
·
answer #7
·
answered by lotusice 4
·
0⤊
0⤋