True.
2007-01-06 04:50:52
·
answer #1
·
answered by us5we2 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
True, but the UN should really be moved to Switzerland or Sweden (nuetral countries). I do not like the UN and the USA is always criticized by it for one reason or another. I do not believe that we would be weaker in the UN if it were moved. And then we could get rid of that awful anti-American/anti-gun statue in front of the UN. No where else in America would this insult to our country be put up with. The statue is of a beautiful Colt Python .357 with the barrel tied into as knot. This is patently offensive because the gun is a CIVILIAN model. Why not the AK-47? Because it might offend Cuba, Viet Nam, or some other third world country that hides behind anti-American sentiment. I have attached a page where you can scroll down and see the offending statue.
2007-01-06 04:59:23
·
answer #2
·
answered by david m 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
True. Harry Truman (U.S. President) was the driving force behind the United Nations.
2007-01-06 04:51:26
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
True
2007-01-06 04:55:54
·
answer #4
·
answered by SnowWebster2 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
True
2007-01-06 04:54:37
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
True
2007-01-06 04:51:32
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
True
2007-01-06 04:51:21
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
True of course. I totally agree with FlyChicc4! This is a no brainer!
2007-01-06 04:56:58
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yup
2007-01-06 04:51:35
·
answer #9
·
answered by FUSIONMASTER 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
True, and if you would have paid attention in class you would have known this.
2007-01-06 04:56:46
·
answer #10
·
answered by FlyChicc420 5
·
1⤊
0⤋