2007-01-06 02:43:59 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Some 40 years IF concerted efforts were taken today. Of course, we still face years of debate, posturing, inattention to the priority nature of the problem, and, probably, crisis, before appropriate attention and resources are awarded to it.
2007-01-06 02:51:30 · answer #1 · answered by ElOsoBravo 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It will take forever and a weekend. Even though the tree hugging Liberals want to push hardcore for alternative fuel sources, they do not want us building factories or plants that would allow us to produce those alternative fuel sources. To them that would be still polluting.
2007-01-06 10:47:16 · answer #2 · answered by deftonehead778 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
When the actual cost of the use and manufacture of AFS's becomes less or on par with fossil fuels the change will be extremely rapid anything else is BS Money is the only motivator in the final analysis.
2007-01-06 10:51:53 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Looking at the new Bush Budget it would take longer than 30 years, everytime a new alternative energy program is launced Bush cuts spending for it.
2007-01-06 10:47:02 · answer #4 · answered by AD 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
10 - 15 to get the ball rolling...additional 10 - 15 for full conversion. Government has to mandate the way and can't depend on the private sector to lead on this matter.
2007-01-06 10:46:40 · answer #5 · answered by Laughing Man Copycat 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
It could be instant if everyone would ride a bicycle, IE: human leg power!
2007-01-06 10:49:05 · answer #6 · answered by Sicko 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
All the more reason to start now.
2007-01-06 10:50:06 · answer #7 · answered by Overt Operative 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
ethanol, why is it only used during the winter months?
2007-01-06 10:46:52 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋