Custody of child depends on this golden rule " Welfare Of The Child" based on this rule courts decide the custody keeping in view the income of the parents, educational status of the parents, age of the child, time each of the parent can devote for the development & growth of the child, remarriage of the parents if they are divorced, & even the choise of the child. Even if any one parent gets custody the other can be granted right to meet & even keep the child for some reasonable period of time. Now applying these principle what I can say mother in this case should be granted the custody as the father has ignored the child as he has not being paying for the child support. He has not show any intentions to keep the child that will help in the proper development & growth of this child & will be in welfare of this child.
2007-01-07 18:04:29
·
answer #1
·
answered by bisexualmale s 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
it just depends on a lot of circumstances. If they can find one parent unfit the other parent will get the child. If not the will see which parent would be the better option for the child. they will take into consideration the length of time the mother has had the child, they will take a lot of things into consideration. If they can find no reason why either parent should not have the child they could do a 50/50 custody. This is more a question for your attorney. They will also look at who moved from the state where they once were all living. They really take several things into consideration and really the only one who will decide this is the judge. with much more info I could tell you what a good possibility would be but, I cant with just the info provided.
2007-01-06 02:25:46
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Depends on the state you live in, the report of the social worker that does the home visit and the financial status of either parent. His paying or non-payment of child support has little or no bearing on the custody battle, it's a separate issue.
Despite what most people seem to think, judges are not arbitrary in their assessment of living situations and choices of with whom the child should live. If you're a dope fiend and you have no visible means of support, but the father is a cold, aloof person with no time to allot for the child, you'll still get custody. You'll be watched like a hawk, but that's not the question. I'd make myself as stable as possible in the time you have between now and the assessment and pray the social worker buys it...
2007-01-06 02:27:40
·
answer #3
·
answered by wetdreamdiver 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
As the others have said, it depends. If the child has always lived with the mother than she will probably get custody barring any terrible facts against her. The fact that the father doesn't pay support will be considered as a separate issue. However, it does reflect a poor attitude towards his parental responsibilites.
Good luck.
2007-01-06 21:23:16
·
answer #4
·
answered by CV 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
depends on a lot of factors firstly depends on which country u live in and the laws of the land - ur financial status ur ability to look after the child home support like parents etc and the custodial fight the other spouse puts up
2007-01-06 13:43:35
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
mom will get physical custody unless he can come up with some major proof that she is unfit. Another thing is that if the child is over 12 they can have their say in who they want to live with.
2007-01-06 02:22:21
·
answer #6
·
answered by Miranda 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Usually depends on which parent is more capable of taking care of the child's wellbeing.
2007-01-06 07:40:11
·
answer #7
·
answered by ctsnowmiss 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
if the mom has a job and a stable home then yes she is granted custody
2007-01-06 02:29:24
·
answer #8
·
answered by boehlingsfam 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
"Spiteful"? i'm sorry yet did you're taking position to omit the actual incontrovertible truth that their daughter died? And now the really time they get to ascertain their daughter's legacy ought to you deem fit to carry the baby round? (Or easily imagine to.) they're dealing with 2 profound loses right here - their daughter and their grandchild. Have slightly extra sympathy and understanding. you're also reducing out a superb source right here. you artwork 2 jobs and bypass to school - also apparently relationship "the brainless ask your self" - what time do you extremely ought to dedicate to a 9 month previous who needs around the clock interest? they could also use your busy agenda and inspite of you call a residing challenge hostile to you kiddo, it would want to be a strong idea so that you'll play ball right here. earlier this turns into an unsightly mess, or a good uglier mess, you want to communicate with them out of courtroom. I extremely recommend having a sit the position you may merely communicate about the challenge and how you may want to favor to resolve it. merely state that you've not any objective of reducing them out of your son's existence (they're his mom's mothers and fathers and the nearest component he has to her - you extra effective not shrink them out with no rattling strong reason). you've guardianship of the baby yet that you may want to like it in case you may want to all set up a travelling agenda that a choose might want to signal off on to make it reputable. attempt to settle this out of courtroom like good human beings.
2016-12-01 22:06:01
·
answer #9
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
mommy dearest
2007-01-06 02:36:24
·
answer #10
·
answered by o'juiccy1 2
·
0⤊
0⤋