2007-01-05 23:38:18 · 27 answers · asked by Rustu A 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Bad person gone badder.
2007-01-05 23:40:55 · answer #1 · answered by DAVE 6 · 4⤊ 4⤋
He is GOOD. He has protected this country after we were attacked by an enemy Clinton should have deposed of, (remember Bin Laden was offered up to him 7 different times, by Jordan) and he has kept terrorists OFF American soil, and thank you to Britain for helping in doing that, and other allies. How many terrorist attacks were in Clinton's administration? Too many to count, and he did nothing about any of them. That is why they kept happening. But with Bush, since 9/11, he having just barely begun his presidency, there have been none on our land. I also believe, if Clinton had not wrongfully refused to hand over the keys to the office which holds USA's vital information, from Mr. Bush, I think George could have prevented 9/11.
2007-01-06 00:20:46 · answer #2 · answered by xenypoo 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
As how President AL waged a war, which was criticized mostly, as how, the President HST Approval for using Atom bomb were proved by time that they are the correct decision at that time, though criticized heavily. Bush decision to war was keeping long-term security concerns of USA and not following public sentiment and popular chores. The Bush's decision to war will be proved to be the correct decision by the time to come. By waging the war he simply thwarted the greater threat to the security of USA. Now the tails here and there, which are rising up will be cut shortly. By waging the war Bush sent a clear message to the world "don’t play with USA" . So BUSH is a very intelligent, clever person who protected America in 21 Centuary
2007-01-05 23:57:28 · answer #3 · answered by KIRUBHA 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋
I have never once heard our current president call anyone a name, disrespect anyone in public or speak harshly about democrats or the media, no matter how much they desperately deserve it.
He rarely even mentions specific names unless they're right there with them or he's asked a specific question.
He's got to be pretty decent and has a high regard for the dignity of his office to behave like this. It could be a lot worse. He could be like Harry Reid and hold a press conference daily on the steps of the capital building giving a prewritten hate-ridden speech.
2007-01-05 23:52:09 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Who should care except his family?
It's what he does as president that counts. The public has already given its verdict on the on the Bush presidency. Just wait till he surges the troops. It will all go from bad to worse.
2007-01-06 00:19:09 · answer #5 · answered by TxSup 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
He's not sinister in the sense, but very selfish, only making commands that benefit him and his family, especially his father with this whole war in Iraq that he shouldn't have started. Not saying he's bad person, just makes terrible decisions for our country. He poorly planned this war that was supposed to be against Bin Laden and his desire to destroy America, and people who don't understand that and think Bush is doing good for our country by bombing a country that wasn't a threat to us and killing innocent people there, ought to have a reality check. By killing those people who already had their personal issues to deal with, only fuels their fire and hatred towards America. When people here die, we all want to be sympathetic but what about the innocent people there? They may not have such a stable government, but interfering only makes it worse. Then everytime the question "What about Bin Laden" pops up, Bush, his administration and other Bush supporters tend to beat around the subject. Why? Hm you tell me!
And people say how he is doing a good thing by keeping us protected. Ok, so why ignore the threats from Bind Laden and other terrorist who were so determind to kill Americans before 9/11. That could have been avoided if action was taken place. Of course he's going to try to finish a war his father started(the war in Iraq). And most of the people don't care that they are being helped over throwing Saddam Hussein and his government policies, as long as someone else is dying fighting instead of them. Our soilders are being killed there with no security, and the only reason why Iraqi civilians die is because of U.S. bombs and those of a different government. Snipers, suicide bombers, millitants are killing Americans and not the civilians there. Then you have the ones who are killing both civilians and U.S. troops. You don't know exactly who is for and against who. All that confusion, and dying for no reason. It's not so much that it's unfair to have us help with their porblems, but we are not being protected. There women and children and men are dying, but so are many young men, many fathers, young women are dying from our country as well. And neither of us are happy after 6 years of bull!
Krazy Libra
2007-01-05 23:57:05 · answer #6 · answered by krazy_libra_from_ac 5 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Low on common sense. A bit to quick to make a desicion and a bit power mad in a way but i would say bad. hitler was bad, stalin was bad, George Wubble U Bush is just the town idiot.
2007-01-06 00:18:06 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I question the morals of anyone who thinks he is a good person. Do "good people" seek to legalize the torture of prisoners or operate secret prisons? Do good people send thousands to their deaths in a war manufactured on lies? Does a good man insinuate that people who aren't in agreement with his policies don't belong in this country? I don't think so. He is a very bad man.
2007-01-06 00:08:07 · answer #8 · answered by melouofs 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Bush is Bush
2007-01-05 23:41:56 · answer #9 · answered by AD 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋
As a person I cannot say, as our president bad, very bad!!
2007-01-06 00:24:05 · answer #10 · answered by ball_courtney 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
He is an oil man. Is that good or bad?
2007-01-06 01:29:54 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋