is it true that: if john kerry had won the last election, a democrat would be president now?

Question

thanks to those few who are considering this seriously (possible worlds, truth of the antecedent...).
for the "duh," "retarded," etc. crowd, i am happy that this provides such an easy way of felling superior and smart, but the joke may be on you and it was certainly not the "best answer" i am after...
"if i had been been retarded, i wouldn't be asking counterfactual conditionals on a free q&a web site..."

Answer 1

If-then statements where the if is false are usually considered to be true, but that's mostly a convention.

For example, I say, "IF the sky turns fuschia tomorrow THEN I'll be a monkey's uncle." I'd be lying if the sky turns fuschia and I didn't have a monkey relative. However, the sky won't turn fuschia, so the non-existence of any simian neices or nephews won't be relevant. The truth value of my statement, therefore, can't be tested, but I don't think anyone would call me a liar.

In math, A->B (if A then B) statements are considered true if ~A (if A is not true.) I'm not aware of any significant consequences to redefining A->B as "truth neutral" if ~A. Statements without any truth value exist in math: 2+2 is an example.

So, by convention, the statement you've given is true. However, it's also true that if John Kerry had been elected president in 2004, a Libertarian would be president, as would a Republican, as would George Washington.

Answer 2

i imagine she can make a much extra effective vice chairman the 2d time round. i have self assurance she extremely did study from her blunders on the well being care plan disaster the first time round, and has shown an potential to artwork with former enemies contained in the Senate. If she wasn't able to swallow her delight and play a helping function, she does not were able to stay with bill, good? She is smart, able, and also very tuned in to the hazards of politics, which Obama would not like and prefers now to not spotlight. So perhaps it would want to be strong to have someone like Hillary at his lower back and giving him information IF she change into able to settle for this function complete-heartedly, and that i'm not particular about this. some worry that pursuing her own political fortunes might want to trump loyalty to Obama, and that i imagine it truly is a valid challenge. obviously a number of her supporters are literally not unswerving to the Democratic party and are not helping Obama even inspite of the indisputable fact that she has recommended him. some say openly that Hillary would not extremely help Obama -- are they good? If not, why are they so unconvinced?

Answer 3

Ummmmmm are you serious? Well since john kerry is a democrat and if he won he would still be in his term of office then i'm gonna go with a yeah a democrat would be presedent if john kerry would have won...........

Answer 4

not if there was election fraud. if the HBO documentary Hacking Democracy is correct, Kerry did win the 2004. the real mystery may be why he didnt contest. see BlackBoxVoting.org

Answer 5

Deh. He'd still be in office.

Answer 6

Probably...Thank God he didnt win, eh?

Answer 7

This is not philosophy it's politics!

Answer 8

Der .Yes.