We see that Bush is changing commanders in Iraq to try give his failed policies there some hope of acceptance by the people of the US and the world generally, do you agree with me that our nation would create a much better image if he himself was replaced with a democrat President?
2007-01-05 21:10:25 · 13 answers · asked by Koala 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Personally I think Hillary would give us the best image
2007-01-05 21:23:53 · update #1
Trust me, you would definitely have a better image. At least you wouldn't have a buffoon running your country anymore.
2007-01-05 21:15:30 · answer #1 · answered by catv1105 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Only if that person fell lock step into the beliefs of a passive society. Our current President had his country attacked in 2001. His response to that attack has been generally opposed to on whatever he did. He believes, as he should, that his number one priority is to serve and protect his country. He does not care if he takes a hit on popularity poles across the world. He has stood up to a terrorist run world and will not back down. This president has assisted with food and money , more than any other president to other countries. There is a presidential election in 2008. If we change direction on the current war on terror, it will happen then.
2007-01-06 05:30:27 · answer #2 · answered by meathead 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, because the debacle in Iraq would still be happening, the commanders will still be in place, and the only difference will be that we have a war in the entire Middle East instead of only in Iraq.
2007-01-06 05:14:35 · answer #3 · answered by Hunter B 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Being liked in this world means lack of safety for your citizens.You liberals whine constantly about world acceptance yet the police and governments whose respect you seek do not offer their citizen the right to privacy and hold prisoners without charges routinely.They are the very countries that are suffering terror attacks and riots.The direction you seek to emulate is one in which the citizens are subject to the government not the government subject to the citizens.
Most of the countries you so greatly wish to like us are the ones selling weapons and technology to our enemies.
2007-01-06 06:09:25 · answer #4 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't have to speculate that because Bush will be replaced in January of 2009.
2007-01-06 05:31:12 · answer #5 · answered by jerofjungle 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Speaking as a non-American, I would say that the issue here is not party-political. Having a President who was half-way articulate and could feed himself without suffering a bruised eye would be as good a start as any.
2007-01-06 05:15:35 · answer #6 · answered by Alan A 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Ya know, if your side hadn't been rabidly anti-Bush since before his first election, your opinion might actually mean something. We have seen that no matter what Bush does your side will find a whine point. For the last 6 years you have been sore losers, and since November, sore winners.
2007-01-06 05:14:40 · answer #7 · answered by netnazivictim 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
In a nutshell, who gives a damn WHAT the UN community thinks? They are NOT pillars of society!
http://home.peoplepc.com/psp/newsstory.asp?cat=TopStories&referrer=welcome&id=20070106/459f2cd0_3ca6_1552620070106133721590
2007-01-06 06:44:32 · answer #8 · answered by Bawney 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We'd have a better image if Barney was in charge.
2007-01-06 05:22:57 · answer #9 · answered by Papa W 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Oh, my, gosh. Wouldn't it be great if we could get rid of Bush?
2007-01-06 05:16:41 · answer #10 · answered by FLHRCI 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋