2007-01-05 21:05:15 · 17 answers · asked by wheels on the boat!!!!!11 1 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Astronomy & Space
SORRY - THIS IS A BIT LONG - BUT INTERESTING!
Some of them are a lot more recent than you'd think - and one recent one is actually of historic value to London Underground train fanatics because their photos of an area around Brent and Colindale (north west London) clearly show a train on the northbound track just north of Colindale station.
Nothing unusual about this you might say BUT this particular train also clearly shows the red painted front (leading end pointing towards Edgware) but the train has only FIVE carriages, and the rear of the train does NOT have the red end which proves that is not a normal rear carriage. (The Northern line was by that time running six-car trains of "1995" stock with the cab ends being painted red). Research has shown that these five cars were in actual fact the front part of the train which was derailed at Camden Town a few days earlier causing an almost complete shut-down of the line between Euston and Edgware. The damaged rear carriage was removed "piecemeal" from the site, and the remaining five cars were eventually moved under their own power from Camden Town to Edgware depot on MONDAY 20th OCTOBER 2003, and by sheer coincidence, this was the train that was photographed by Google on its journey ON THAT VERY DAY!
I don't think there's ever going to be a more positive way of identifying the date any particular photographic trip than this!
I've just realised that we're now in 2007, so 2003 isn't as recent as I thought! (Nonetheless, it's an actual DATE !)
2007-01-05 22:48:27 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
By looking at my mother's house, they were taken before 2003 and likely after 1995. I can see some improvements in her house made and some that were not yet visible.
(I assume that the pictures are composites from many different photos and times.)
2007-01-05 21:09:58 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
The pictures were taken over a period of time, with (generally) ones of the countryside being the oldest, and city ones being the more recent ones showing larger changes. It's all ongoing... ....there is no specific year.
2007-01-05 22:39:42 · answer #3 · answered by gino m 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The pictures of were I live were taken in 2001 -I know because of the cars on the drive!
2007-01-05 21:18:40 · answer #4 · answered by Minniex 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
between 2003-2006
2007-01-05 22:39:39 · answer #5 · answered by Dan 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
well i went to florida in 2003 and when i came back i couldnt see the villas where i stayed. but then i deleted google earth and downloaded it again the villas are there, so the one i use is probably a more up to date version
2007-01-05 22:22:10 · answer #6 · answered by Babe, pig in the city ;) 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
ah. I looked up my house on it and that was when we were having and extention at the back of the house built so 2000 ...... well thats when Aberdeen was photgraphed anyway! But as it was such a big project it probably took a couple of years.
2007-01-05 21:22:30 · answer #7 · answered by dragonwithpurplepants 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I think somewhere between 2000-2002 cause when I typed in my home address it pictured my white car I had during that period of time.
2007-01-05 21:08:11 · answer #8 · answered by jade_143 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I'd say about 2005. My latest car appears outside on the photo of my house.
2007-01-05 22:49:13 · answer #9 · answered by GenetteS 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They take them in many situations and patch them in slowly to replace. the place i stay a container grew to grow to be a tesco food market and you should work out motor vehicle park strains on the sphere for a whilst while they have been patching the %. in!!!
2016-11-26 23:32:15 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋