Well, statistically it has to be McGill.. But age soon catching up for him... I think Dan Cullen is a good choice....
2007-01-05 20:09:14
·
answer #1
·
answered by Sumeet 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Macgill could maybe play a few series, but I rekon he should've moved to England years ago!! Then maybe he might've got a game and England might have a decent team!!
Dan Cullen is a good prospect for ODI matches, because he is a tight bowler. But test cricket is all about wickets. That leaves Cam White out, and maybe Nathan Hauritz. Brad Hogg can take big wickets, so maybe he will get a game.
Cullen Bailey from SA is a promising talent, but needs maturing. Otherwise, I'm quite happy (in Australia) to play 4 seamers (Clark, Lee, Johnson and Bracken/Hilfenhaus/Tait) and an all rounder (Symonds/Watson/White)
Cricket is going to miss Shane Warne!
2007-01-06 05:07:07
·
answer #2
·
answered by I'm not a Gypsy!! 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think Cam White should be the next spinner in teh side. I feel soory for him as Australia seems to have overlooked him in their search for an Aussie Flintoff. Who said the gun allrounder needs to be a fast bowler? Why cant you have the spinner as the allrounder and play another pace bowler in the specialist spinners spot?? Cam White is a good bowler and is capable of batting at 4 for his state side - he will be an excellent player for Australia if given an extended chance in the side.
2007-01-06 18:24:44
·
answer #3
·
answered by kjkool_82 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Most people say Magill but i personally think our young kids should be given a chance such as Cameron White, Nathan Hauritz etc. If u choose Magill who is already 35 australia will be in demand for another spinner soon
2007-01-06 04:06:58
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anirudh T 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Stuart McGill should in the short term. He has experience
in test matches, more than any other likely replacement at the
moment.
2007-01-06 06:54:24
·
answer #5
·
answered by \Magda 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
McGill or Cameron White
2007-01-06 08:22:54
·
answer #6
·
answered by manofseries 3
·
0⤊
0⤋