It was not a mistake.
You dishonor the service of our troops when you say they died for nothing. They died protecting you from the spread of terrorism and you should be grateful.
2007-01-05 19:23:25
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
5⤋
If you were to take an objective look into what is happening in the middle east, you would not say they died for nothing. The troops say they think they should be there. There is alot being accomplished, but the major networks do not want you to know. The number 1 complaint by the troops last month, speaking to Democratic fact finding group, was the biased news coverage that they stated was nothing like what was really happening in Iraq. That was reported by a Democratic Senator. I can understand why you might oppose the war, but how about HONEST coverage by CBS, NBC, and ABC, so the American Public can really tell what is happening there. While I agree with you that Iraq had nothing to do with 911, we are tying up alot of Islamic militants and their resources that would or could have been used to attack America or Britain. Also getting rid of a dictator that killed up to a hundred thousand people a year is also a pretty good cause.
2007-01-05 19:19:30
·
answer #2
·
answered by mark g 6
·
0⤊
3⤋
To the person who says Clinton lied and perjured himself... yes, he lied about his personal life when confronted. Shame on him but why is it any concern of ours whether he had a mistress or not anyways. All of the great presidents have had mistresses, something I disagree with but my morals can't really control the world.
The question I pose to you is when will you admit that Bush, and Rice lied to the American public on many occasions about much more severe issues, such as the one in question.
As for the question, neocons will never admit to any wrong doing because to do so would be to admit that they don't actually have there so called connection with god and morality. To admit that thousands of people have died because one man wanted to show up daddy would be to admit that they are nationalistic and fundamental in there belief, making them no better than those that they supposedly went to war with in the first place (aka the terrorists).
2007-01-05 19:26:49
·
answer #3
·
answered by Memnoch 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
I gave you a "thumbs up"; but to answer the question. Neocons will admit Iraq was a mistake when Mark Foley starts liking adult women.
2007-01-05 19:57:12
·
answer #4
·
answered by Gemini 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
you should first be sure what you advise through 'worth'. The conflict has larger the gross revenues to Texas oil companies through four-5 situations in revenue. It has additionally made our acquaintances in Saudi Arabia very wealthy, which in all probability includes Osama Bin encumbered. while Bush landed on the plane provider and introduced "undertaking performed", we additionally introduced that our troops have been leaving Saudi Arabian soil. This grew to become right into a call for from Osama Bin encumbered. So, ask the place your perspective is, and who advantages, and you should locate you're dropping it slow attempting to convince the neocons that it wasn't "worth" it. Silverman have been given his coverage money for the two towers. think of that. there is in basic terms one question for all applicants: "Are you Corporatist or Localist?"
2016-11-26 23:26:20
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Probably never.
The Great Controversy by Ellen G White explains the world perfectly
We cant mess with destiny & fate
2007-01-05 19:46:40
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
OWB, I have posted this question with linx to back up my statement. The linx specifically quote Bush admitting to error, and still some of these people will not listen...Why wear your fingers down to nubs trying to get them to research their political values, when they are so willing to follow blindly?
2007-01-05 19:29:41
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Right after you rah, rah Democrats admit Clinton lied to the American people and perjured himself in court. Something every other American goes to jail for. (note: perjury has nothing to do with sex.)
2007-01-05 19:17:07
·
answer #8
·
answered by someguy123123 1
·
3⤊
2⤋
Never, They do not admit mistakes. Look they elected teenie weenie bush. When will we ever learn. You must listen to The all knowing ***PRAYNOGRAPHER*** His wisdom is both, wise and dumb. You can have it both ways.Hail to the PRAYNOGRAPHER.
2007-01-05 19:18:37
·
answer #9
·
answered by Praynographer ! 3
·
3⤊
0⤋
Why are you asking rhetorical questions. Politcal Statements in a forum are a HUUUUUUUUGE waste of time.
2007-01-05 19:36:06
·
answer #10
·
answered by swhite3084 2
·
0⤊
2⤋