The fact that you are allowed to ask this question without the fear of death or jailing is the answer to your question. It's not just about murder or death but about freedom and rights of their people.
2007-01-05 18:41:58
·
answer #1
·
answered by Airadine 3
·
7⤊
3⤋
You are seriously undereducated if you believe that Bush killed 100,000 civilians. Yes it was probably wrong for us to go into Iraq, but we can't pull out now.
Bush isn't hanging because Bush isn't a bad a person as everyone makes him out to be. So 2,000 of our troops got killed since we've been there.. we should definately leave. Do you realize that 2,000 isn't that many. Oh we should probably pull out of California too because uhm.. California has 2,000 homicides a year.. that sounds good too huh?
Just because people are dying doesn't mean that it's any one persons fault. It's not like this war is like Vietnam with soldiers dying at each others side constantly.
2007-01-05 18:45:25
·
answer #2
·
answered by Miss Krista Marie 2
·
2⤊
2⤋
Saddam was killed too soon. He should have been tried for the rest of the well over a million people he killed.
As far as murdering 100,000 civilians, that's not accurate. There have been many, many more civilians killed by Iraqi insurgents and foreign Arab fighters than by the US and Coalition Forces.
2007-01-05 18:43:38
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 6
·
5⤊
1⤋
There are many combatants that are civilians now, but they look at themselves as fighting for freedom; freedom from the government that is dominated by a different sect of religion; freedom from being dominated by a different ethnic group;freedom from U.S.A. involvement. They are a diverse group of people fighting for a chance to be dominant over the others. What one person calls a terrorist, another calls them a freedom fighter.
Not all casualties have been from scrimmages. I know an Iraqi man who got out of Iraq after the first gulf war because with one missile 500 people in his neighbourhood block were gone like that. How many other civilians died from these missiles. There has been a heavy civilian casualty load both with militias as well as innocents.
2007-01-05 18:58:03
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
You're wrong. It's not 100,000. It's closer to 650,000.
Bush won't hang though. The U.S. is too powerful to allow that to happen. But there will be a price and it will be paid. No one can do what Bush has done without serious consequences.
2007-01-05 18:53:26
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
1⤋
Sadam Husain kill more than million of iraqi people for any simple reason . He punishs iraqis by cutting their ears and their tongue . One time my relative hanged by saddam authoriteis becuase he said when i become a president i will do so and so .
2007-01-05 18:56:47
·
answer #6
·
answered by barzan khan 1
·
3⤊
2⤋
Bin Laden!? Is that you!? You are gonna hang buddy-boy and when the trap door on the gallows drops you are gonna soil your pajama pants just like Saddam!
The only people killed by US forces have been combatants and not innocent civilians like you "peaceful muslims" seem to enjoy killing while you hide behind women and children.....
2007-01-05 18:52:26
·
answer #7
·
answered by Mr. US of A, Baby! 5
·
0⤊
3⤋
Hanging is not the answer ..as you can see ..Hanging of Saddam did not achieve anything ..Hanging Bush will not achieve anything ..History will put Bush in his place ..lol
2007-01-05 18:56:04
·
answer #8
·
answered by JJ 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
It's amazing how many people swallow sht and believe all the lies they hear. You really think no innocent civillians were killed in this war? you think all these bombs were dropped over 'terrorsist'?? well, its so easy to fool you guys then. Sure Bush should be hanged long time ago, but not becuae "you can't hang someone for being an idiot" but becuase has has the power.. check this page:
http://hotzone.yahoo.com/b/hotzone/blogs19056
2007-01-05 18:48:17
·
answer #9
·
answered by mr_dark_eyed 2
·
3⤊
3⤋
If you are concerned about innocent civilians being killed in a war zone then maybe the Iraqi insurgents should start dressing differently and quit hiding behind them or in a group of them so it's easier to kill our American soldiers. Maybe then, your innocents would be safer. It's the Iraqi's who are killing innocent civilians, not our president and not our soldiers.
2007-01-05 18:44:50
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
3⤋
You need to learn how to spell before people will take you seriously. Bush is a horrible person though i agree he wants the permission to totrture but condems saddam for it. A little hippocritical.
2007-01-05 18:47:14
·
answer #11
·
answered by Beaverscanttalk 4
·
0⤊
4⤋