Its too small, if we considered pluto a planet then many moons and asteroids would qualify as well. Personally I think we should bend the rules because it's pluto. I heart pluto *tear*
2007-01-05 17:58:06
·
answer #1
·
answered by premise 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
The definition of planet was defined in 2006 by the IAU (International Astronomy Union) that a planet must be: A celestial body that: (a) is in orbit around the Sun, (b) has sufficient mass for its self-gravity to overcome rigid body forces so that it assumes a hydrostatic equilibrium (nearly round) shape, and (c) has cleared the neighbourhood around its orbit.
As pluto did not did not qualify for these features, it isn't a planet.
2007-01-05 19:48:34
·
answer #2
·
answered by Me'Shell 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Pluto is a dwarf planet
2007-01-05 18:03:11
·
answer #3
·
answered by futureastronaut1 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
The short answer is that it is too small to be considered a planet. It was reclassified as a "dwarf planet."
Here is a link to the current wikipedia entry:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pluto
2007-01-05 17:58:40
·
answer #4
·
answered by Mark H 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Pluto is not considered a planet because it is very small and is composed of mostly ice and frozen gasses. Its composition more closely resembles a comet than a planet. (I am reasonably sure Clyde Tombaugh is rolling in his grave over this.)
2007-01-05 21:08:33
·
answer #5
·
answered by longhairabsalom 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
From what I understood it was more of its irradic orbit more than anything else
2007-01-05 18:28:32
·
answer #6
·
answered by hurricanemercedes 5
·
0⤊
0⤋