English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

describe y pluto is not a planet any more

2007-01-05 17:56:01 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Science & Mathematics Astronomy & Space

6 answers

Its too small, if we considered pluto a planet then many moons and asteroids would qualify as well. Personally I think we should bend the rules because it's pluto. I heart pluto *tear*

2007-01-05 17:58:06 · answer #1 · answered by premise 3 · 0 0

The definition of planet was defined in 2006 by the IAU (International Astronomy Union) that a planet must be: A celestial body that: (a) is in orbit around the Sun, (b) has sufficient mass for its self-gravity to overcome rigid body forces so that it assumes a hydrostatic equilibrium (nearly round) shape, and (c) has cleared the neighbourhood around its orbit.
As pluto did not did not qualify for these features, it isn't a planet.

2007-01-05 19:48:34 · answer #2 · answered by Me'Shell 1 · 0 0

Pluto is a dwarf planet

2007-01-05 18:03:11 · answer #3 · answered by futureastronaut1 3 · 0 0

The short answer is that it is too small to be considered a planet. It was reclassified as a "dwarf planet."

Here is a link to the current wikipedia entry:


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pluto

2007-01-05 17:58:40 · answer #4 · answered by Mark H 4 · 0 0

Pluto is not considered a planet because it is very small and is composed of mostly ice and frozen gasses. Its composition more closely resembles a comet than a planet. (I am reasonably sure Clyde Tombaugh is rolling in his grave over this.)

2007-01-05 21:08:33 · answer #5 · answered by longhairabsalom 2 · 0 0

From what I understood it was more of its irradic orbit more than anything else

2007-01-05 18:28:32 · answer #6 · answered by hurricanemercedes 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers