LIBERAL DEMOCRATS ONLY: Would You Have Rolled Over For Hitler Too?

Question

Thankfully, President Bush and Prime Minister Blair saw fit to eliminate Saddam, the genocidal despot. I question whether Liberal Dems would even defend their own mothers, wives and daughters from rape--I have a strong suspicion they might seek to negotiate with the rapist.

Saddam violated umpteen UN Resolutions, every major Democrat is on video stating that Saddam had WMDs dating back to 1998 (including Clinton, Albright, Reid, Pelosi, Edwards, Rockefeller, Kerry, H. Clinton and Dean), and he murdered over 1,000,000 people. Congress approved the War Resolution (with the vast majority of those Dems voting yes), and some of these Loser Liberals are saying the war was "illegal"? Really? From what law school did you graduate Order of the Coif? Get in the game losers.

Answer 1

While she used powerful words in accepting the Speaker’s gavel that wrapped herself in the flag of God-fearing American patriotism, her deeds of the past speak far louder. Pelosi is pro-homosexual marriage, pro-abortion, even pro-partial birth abortion. She has voted against tax cuts, against the Patriot Act, against allowing the words “under God” to remain in the pledge of allegiance, and against allowing public displays of the Ten Commandments. She has voted against stopping illegal immigration. And Pelosi has worked to undermine traditional marriage, even by voting against the Defense of Marriage Act in 1996.
Pelosi closed her acceptance speech with a phrase associated with the Communitarian Network when she said, “Let us all stand together to move our country forward, seeking common ground for the common good.” The Communitarian Network is a self-described “coalition of individuals and organizations who have come together to shore up the social, moral and political environment…a nonpartisan, nonsectarian, transnational association."
Communitarian doctrine puts government above individual rights by developing democratic consensus often using moral issues.

Answer 2

Here's the problem with that argument: Saddam was bad; I don't think anyone denies it. His regime was one of the most digusting, vile, abusive ones that ever existed in modern times. However, that description also fits many other regimes around the world against which we take little or no action. Iraq got UN Resolutions because the US and other large nations saw an interest and drew the world's attention.

I have no problem with fighting human rights violations and going overseas to fight threats to our national security. You want us to get in the game? I couldn't agree with you more. But let's make sure we play it to the end and take out ALL the players. That means nations whose crimes we've turned a blind eye to, nations that will cost massive funds and troops to defeat, without the victory Americans are used to.

Answer 3

First.... Roosevelt was a Democrat.
Second....Saddam didn't attack the United States.
Third.....North Korea has said they have Nuclear weapons and the means to deliver them to our Western shores. Iran has publicly called for the complete destruction of the United States, Israel, and the UK. Al Quada claimed responsibility for the attacks of 9/11.
We are in the game it's just that not everyone is following the rules of engagement!!
As to illegal....people are referring to the UN not sanctioning the war. If we want to make other countries of the world comply with UN law so should we....yeah??

Answer 4

Remember that it was Neville Chaimberlain, a staunch conservative, a member of the British Conservative Party, who had signed the Munich Agreement, which enacted the doctrine of Appeasement of Hitler. Also it was Winston Churchill, head of the liberal minority who first recognized the danger of Nazism, fascism, and the threat posed by Adolf Hitler. Churchill did not want appeasement and for that he was considered unpatriotic.

While it's true that tyrants and dictators should not be appeased in any way, it is not true that appeasement is a doctrine that all liberals adhere themselves to.

Answer 5

Hey, Jessica, I found that if I click on your link, all your questions pop up. How about that? I guess you are stuck with me for a while.

Have you pulled your own data on the link between political leaning and level of education and run your own statistical analysis? I understand you don't like simple regression, or have a complaint about my application of it.

Though I know that my application of it is rock solid, I wonder if you have the guts to pull the data and run it yourself using your tactily superior statistical training.

I would bet you that any legitimate application of statistical methods will lead to the same inescapable conclusion which is an unshakeable characteristic of the data --

That level of education is a variable that loads with statistical significance in the explanation of variance between Democratic and Republican support in the 2004 Presidential Election. The direction of the influence is positive for Democratic support, negative for Republican support.

Do you deal in data or are you only an Ann Coulter wannabe?

Answer 6

What do you mean by rolled over? People who have used this
expression are referring to the subjects for...Example "Your fmother might say..(if your father was deceased) ..
If you marry that man your rfather will roll over in his grave..!
Which means the dead would not have peace and be restless,
Especially if they they loved you that much.Well your mother might hate your fiance according to hopefully what your past father wished for you ,....I'm not a liberal democrat..acrding to "your" definition ...I wouldnt find one person here ..who knows exactly what that is.
"Liberal" hmmmm.Define liberal democrat in your own words.
Then add it to your question based on your meaning....
Your question makes no sense other then insulting what or who you may deem or think are being liberals,but that's acording to you.Your question compares to zombies..Do You think liberals are zombies Your need serious help...Why? Have you known or do know someone who rapes liberal peoples daughters and mothers from rape?Do you believe there is a mother daughter raping conspiracy???What do you think they might try and prove?

Answer 7

Why are not we assisting something of the international this is having a similar issues. Like Africa case in point! Plus Africa is a lot closer the then center east. issue is that we don't run our autos on diamonds. Btw Al Qaeda does exist even however i do no longer have confidence it somewhat is unique to Iraq. the place is Ben Ladin???? does not appear like he's in Iraq!!!!

Answer 8

And Now we see the inside view of the Republicans on the subject of bipartisanship !!

A major percentage of the individuals that rolled over Hitler were Democrats, sweetness, so don't defame them as easily as you do the AMERICAN patriots that simply have a different view of the world as you !!!

Answer 9

Uh, no. Kind of an obnoxiously put question, if you ask me.

Liberal doesn't equal brainless or prejudiced. I resent being referred to as a "loser liberal," if you don't mind my saying.

Since when do we have to be so high and mighty on here? You seem to think pretty highly of yourself. I'd climb off that pedestal if I were you.

Answer 10

We are in the game. It's just not your game.

Having a different plan, and a different set of values, does not make us defeatist or traitors. There is no one who is not happy to see a dictator out of power, however we saw a different road to take to get here.