Mr Bush is taking people out of their homes at 0300 and shooting them in the head, and killing the entire Family and then village. He's drilling holes in the heads of his own country men. He has rape Squads, and Mass graves of up to 20,000 people. he has all this like Saddam. Your very clever for some one of your age.
By the way I've been there seven times now and I never saw him shoot any of us. I have however seen Fathers set their daughters on fire for waving to us as we drove by in our vehicles, delivering medical supplies to the Iraqis.
2007-01-05 17:15:28
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
11⤊
0⤋
What about the Troops? Aren't you taking power and free will from them? Didn't they decide for themselves what they would do? American troops are the bravest, strongest, and best the U.S. has to offer. They put their lives on the line to protect their families from people like Saddam. Why question the leader when the troops are the ones with the guns. Saddam was a ruthless dictator who tortured and cruelly subjected his own countrymen because they were different. Bush may not be the best, but our troops are! Never disrespect those who defend you! By disrespecting them you make them much more likely to fail you and their families.
2007-01-06 01:28:33
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
1⤋
So with your logic, George Washington, Abraham Lincoln, Woodrow Wilson, FDR, Harry Truman, Lyndon Johnson & Clinton should have all be killed? There were wars during their administrations. Bush is not personally killing anyone. This is gonna shock you but in a war, people die! It's so weird that way! Saddam illegally killed thousands of people for his own personal (albeit psyhco) reasons, not because of a war. I think your question is completely ignorant and since you don't know any facts, you jump on whatever bandwagon you think is popular at the moment. Way to think for yourself! When you get through reading about world history and can actually form a thought on your own, please, post another question on here. In the meantime, try not to let anyone sell you wooden nickels.
2007-01-06 01:25:40
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
1⤋
1) Directly, your troops were killed by the enemy.
2) Indirectly, your troops were killed by the nation who elected the President who sent the troops overseas.
The U.S. is a country of democracy. The nation is partly responsible. It is totally up to the nation.
2007-01-06 05:36:51
·
answer #4
·
answered by area52 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
It's idiotic to compare President Bush with Saddam. Our President is sending our troops to do their job, a job they signed up for (in fact, my husband is in Iraq right now) and he is doing the best he knows to do. (Do you have a better solution?)Saddam had people assassinated because they disagreed with him. Hardly the same.
2007-01-06 01:42:45
·
answer #5
·
answered by Heidi 2
·
4⤊
0⤋
If I remember correctly, Bush never issued a draft. Thank God there are brave souls in our country(like my brother-in-law) who signed up willingly to serve our country and keep you safe. These people have answered a calling and you should be grateful to them for putting themselves in harm's way so you don't have to. They know when they sign up for the military what the possibilities are and they still sign on the dotted line; not only for themselves, but for you too!`
2007-01-06 01:22:36
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
0⤋
Well how would you like it if the President was killing American civilians? Let's not rock the boat.
2007-01-06 01:54:00
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I think he is doing what he has to do to protect America and it's people from terrorist attacks. I, for one am very grateful to him for having the guts to do this, ever though people with weak minds, who can't think for themselves, will say stupid things about him. And I am also very grateful to our troops. You should be also. Were it not for both of them, you might have terrorist coming in your front door. Would you like that? I suppose he flew the planes into the twin towers also? Ignorance abounds!!
2007-01-06 01:34:32
·
answer #8
·
answered by bella 3
·
5⤊
1⤋
Saddam didn't actually commit 60% of the crimes he was charged with because there was no evidence or dead bodies to prove that 60%. However the 40% of killings and crimes against humanity he did commit were equivalent to those of George W. Bush, Bill Clinton, Ronald Reagan, Pervez Musharraf etc. The fact is a majority of the world leaders have blood on their hands. It's just a matter of who the media chooses to show off more.
2007-01-06 01:22:07
·
answer #9
·
answered by Mercyfull 2
·
0⤊
6⤋
I think you are in trouble if you don't know how to recognize the good from evil. I also think your question is impertinent and disrespectful to the Presidency. If you claim to be an American you should be ashamed.
2007-01-06 02:26:17
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋