LIBERAL DEMOCRATS ONLY: Who do You Dislike More?

Question

President George Bush or the late, deposed Iraqi President Saddam Hussein?

Answer 1

I hate the whinning Irritating democrats that just want to sit around and complain about the war and focus all their thinking on bashing our president instead of supporting him for what he feels is best for our country. If he was as big of puss like ya'll, we would have had several other attacks by now.

Answer 2

I think they are two sides of the same horrible force. They both embody the kind of leaders that an enlightened humanity should never allow to be in power. Ironically, they seemed to have canceled each other out. Just as Bush has taken out Saddam, Saddam has, in a way, taken out Bush along with entire Bush family -- politically speaking, that is. Bush's "hard-on" for going to Iraq, and the iron boot he's had to don against foreigners and Americans alike to go ahead with it has destroyed the credibility of his family which really did have dynastic political aspirations. Sorry JEB! There is a tyrant's streak in that Bush family, and everyone sees it quite clearly now, a kind of dangerous simplicity and primitive gangsterism that is very unbecoming of a president. Of course, Saddam could afford to be more open about his tyrannical/gangster nature, but he did not have the capacity to affect and destroy as many lives as this little Bush hick. Saddam was actually the creation of the same folks who went to topple him. All part of a familiar Machiavellian ploy. Set up a brutal dictator, give him the power to commit atrocities, then come to the rescue by publicly executing him and gain the power and admiration due a rescuing hero.

Answer 3

Hussein.....Hands down!
I am not questioning that Saddam was an evil man who deserved to be held accountable for the crimes he committed!

Now....why is Bush allowed to invade the country of Iraq using 9/11 as his motivation..... when Osama Bin Laden and Al Quada proclaimed responsibility for the attacks on the WTC.

Iraq did NOT attack the United States! If Bush was going after Saddam for Human Rights violations and disobeying UN sanctions ....he should have told us that! Not used American citizens outrage to justify an Illegal war against Iraq.
And seriously one more thing!
Time will tell...you mark my words...if you follow the stock market or investigate the people who are financially linked to companies involved in the future of Iraq and HOW the business...of Iraq is handled ...you will see names you have in the present administration. This war IS going to be financially beneficial to MANY people surrounding MR. Bush and his family and friends {Foreign and Domestic}.
The next two years will hold a good deal of filibustering to kill the time until Mr. Bush can relinquish his crown!!
And after all is said and done the only thing that will be served these George W. Bush years is Greed! And not just for him ...but many of his fellow secret society members.
Secret societies have existed and will exist as a way for "The Haves" to remain "The Haves".
I am sorry if the middle class Americans are too full of integrity and hope and trust and yes even ....guilibility to allow themselves to see that politicians who are backed by BIG Money are corrupt and self-serving and could really care less about the average American citizen.
Evil and "evildoers" exist....the problem is they exist in our government too!!!

Answer 4

Hey, Jessica, I found that if I click on your link, all your questions pop up. How about that? I guess you are stuck with me for a while.

Have you pulled your own data on the link between political leaning and level of education and run your own statistical analysis? I understand you don't like simple regression, or have a complaint about my application of it.

Though I know that my application of it is rock solid, I wonder if you have the guts to pull the data and run it yourself using your tactily superior statistical training.

I would bet you that any legitimate application of statistical methods will lead to the same inescapable conclusion which is an unshakeable characteristic of the data --

That level of education is a variable that loads with statistical significance in the explanation of variance between Democratic and Republican support in the 2004 Presidential Election. The direction of the influence is positive for Democratic support, negative for Republican support.

Do you deal in data or are you only an Ann Coulter wannabe?

If you would like your humiliation in this matter to be private, feel free to e-mail me directly at [e-mail] and you can keep your bulldog thing going here without any incremental taint of absurdity.

Answer 5

Saddam Hussein... duh
he bruttally killed thousands. Bush on the other hand is trying to to the what he thinks is right. he must be stupid but not evil like the Iraqi dictator

Answer 6

I'm not a 'liberal' democrat, but I don't think that's a fair question. I don't think democrats HATE George Bush; I believe that's an assumption made by people that get upset if anybody disagrees with George.(kinda like throwing in the HATE card). Disagreeing with someone doesn't imply hatred. Do you hate your friends or members of your family when you disagree with them?

Answer 7

I dislike people that like to start the same old lame nonsense. And no babe...I'm not a Republican, or Dem, OR a Liberal!! But I answered in spite of your "orders". Have a nice day.

Answer 8

You know, I was about to defend GWB, but then I stopped to consider my arguement...

I don't quite consider them in the same league... Sadaam is truly pure evil... his murder tally is up to about the 2,000,000 mark...

But I think it's important to remember how many people have died as a result of an unjust and illegal war that was started by Bushie... that he lied about to convince congress to go along with it...

Answer 9

I have to say Bush because Saddam never did or was going to do anything to hurt me. Bush on the other hand...............

Answer 10

Double negative questions irritate me.

Saddam is dead - he can't kill innocent people anymore.

Bush has two more years to ratchet up his body count.

There