Today in English class we were handed these sheets to instruct us on tolerance by Peggy McIntosh, a notorious "anti-racist" (I hate this term) and I received the one on women. I called some of what McIntosh said baiting (the bold) and the rest misleading or pedantic.
McIntosh wrote 3 of these papers: "Male Privilege" (the one I had) "Straight Privilege" and "White Privilege". All were divided between the class. I'm actually quite surprised she didn't attack the Christians; them being a common target. Her pen must have ran out.
Anyways, I just finished writing a sarcastic, brutally honest response to this paper for homework (I'd so love to post it but I don't know how, I work on a mac). But I'll put in bold the ones I definitely thought were baiting.
*If I am never promoted, it's not because of my sex.
*If I fail in my job or career, I can feel sure this won't be seen as a black mark against my entire sex's capabilities.
*If I'm not conventionally attractive, the disadvantages are relatively small and easy to ignore.
*I can be loud with no fear of being called a shrew. I can be aggressive with no fear of being called a *****.
2007-01-05
16:28:32
·
4 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Law & Ethics
I thought it was ridiculous they were preaching this in public schools. I didn't even see the black one or the gay one but I can assume they were just as bad if not worse.
Thoughts?
2007-01-05
16:29:48 ·
update #1