So the way I understand it:
1- Low interest rates lead to lower savings and higher expenditure
2- Higher expenditure results in more economic activity
3- More economic activity results in more jobs
4- More jobs create more wealth
5- More wealth allows for higher expenditure
If that is the case, wouldn't an economy be best off when the interest rates drop to zero? Why not?
2007-01-05
13:53:53
·
3 answers
·
asked by
BudhaBaba
2
in
Social Science
➔ Economics
But with all the excess wealth, wouldn't people want to invest, hence replacing debt capital with equity capital?
In fact, if you add a tax on savings (disincentive to save) would you not ensure that wealth keeps circulating a maximum number of times, rather than sitting idle in banks?
Would that not be a solution of lack of funds???
2007-01-05
15:23:52 ·
update #1