should i trade chris kaman and baron davis for andre miller, ilgauskas, and matt harpring?
2007-01-05 09:43:08 · 7 answers · asked by Yahoo! King 1 in Sports ➔ Fantasy Sports
Kaman is playing much better lately and although Baron is always an injury risk when he is on the court he is putting up top 10 numbers this season. If you want a shot at winning your league do not make this deal. Miller is the only sure thing, Ilguaskas is inconsistent and Harpring is a depth guy only.
2007-01-05 15:36:44 · answer #1 · answered by viphockey4 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would make the deal simply because Baron Davis is injury proned and Kaman is going down that same road. However, if every body stays healthy I beleive Kaman and Davis are better players.
The upside is Miller is a thoroughbread he gives you assist rebounds and points he doesn't get injured often and he's out to prove himself for his next contract.
Also, Ilgauskas is very valuable to the Cav's success and if they want to keep Lebron they need to win and to win they need Big Z to play big.
Lastly, Harpring is a good fill-in player, but I'd probably drop him unless you really need him. If you think Davis and Kaman will stay healthy hold off. You could parlay up and ask for a better complimentary player than Harpring.
2007-01-05 09:54:33 · answer #2 · answered by Frankie Three Time 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No.
You should keep Kaman. I also think you should go ahead and see what you can get for Davis though.
Don't give Kaman up in that deal. Would be bad move for you. If they want Kaman make them offer someone worth the trade.
But get whatever you can for Davis.
Offer them this Davis for Ilgauskas. See what happens.
2007-01-05 12:12:29 · answer #3 · answered by thenolanater 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Heck no
2007-01-05 09:47:20 · answer #4 · answered by lilg 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That would be a bad move for you.
2007-01-05 09:50:13 · answer #5 · answered by trer 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
keep em.
2007-01-05 21:41:45 · answer #6 · answered by supraman126 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
NO
2007-01-05 10:57:00 · answer #7 · answered by Dan B 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋