Do you trust the moon was split into TWO HALVES some One Thousand Four hundred plus years ago ?

Answer 1

The splitting of the moon was demonstrated before a certain gathering who contradicted the Prophet Muhammad, upon him be peace and blessings, in his cause as an evidence of his Prophethood. It happened momentarily at a time of night. Also, there were obstacles which prevented the others from seeing it, such as mist, clouds and time-differences between different parts of the world. Besides, at that time science and civilization were not yet well advanced and not widespread, and, therefore, the observation of the sky was very limited. Last but not least, there was nothing to necessitate that it should have been seen all over the world. It is because of these reasons that the splitting of the moon was not witnessed in the whole world and related in the history books of other nations.



Yes the moon was split in two, Some unreasoning opponents argue that if that incident had taken place, in would have been mentioned in the histories of such nations as the Chinese, the Japanese and Americans. How could they have witnessed it, given that, when this event happened, in addition to other obstacles, it was barely sunset in such European countries as Spain, France and England, which were then enveloped in mists of ignorance, daytime in America and morning in China and Japan. A thousand curses on such toadies and sycophants of Europe.


And it was also seen in nearby places, the extreme stubbornness of the unbelievers in the Hijaz at that time is well-known and is recorded in history. When the Qur’an, however, announced this incident to the whole world through its verse, The moon split, not any of those unbelievers, who denied the Qur’an, dared to contradict it in this announcement. If this incident had not occurred before their eyes, they would certainly have taken this verse as a pretext to attack the Prophet more formidably in his cause. However, neither the biographies of the Prophet, nor the books of history report anything to suggest that they denied the occurrence of this incident. What was reported concerning their reaction is as the verse records: They say, ‘This is evident magic’. The unbelievers declared the event to be magic, and they added further that if the caravans in other places had seen it, it truly happened, otherwise the Prophet bewitched them. When, however, the caravans coming the following morning from the Yemen and other places announced that they had witnessed the event, the unbelievers showed their usual reaction, saying,–God forbid!–‘The magic of Abu Talib’s orphan has affected even the heavens!’

Wake up, wake up oh disbelivers what ever your scholars told you, you beleive them but they for sure taking you to the wrong path along with themselves. Read for youself the truth.

Answer 2

Even in the middle ages this would have been noticed in Europe.

Chinese astronomers watched the sky every day, and kept accurate records of what they saw. They never saw the moon split in two, although they saw plenty of other things like supernovae.

P.S. I googled it. I had never heard of this before. OK, so the Koran says that the Prophet Mohamed split the moon into two halves and left it that way for a couple hours as a kind of demonstration of religious power. I certainly agree that if I had seen that, I would have been very impressed and would have instantly converted to Islam. However, at the present time I do not believe it just because the Koran says it's so. In fact, it strains credulity and detracts from the verisimilitude of the book.

P.P.S. It's impolite and unproductive to curse someone just because they don't believe something that's written in a book. Condsider the possibility that the book is incorrect, even though in its initial passages it cleverly asserts its own veracity (unlike the holy books of other religions). That doesn't prove anything. It's consistency with reality, as we understand it, that matters. Books, like the internet, can contain falsehood as easily as truth. Unfortunately, people tend to irrationally hang on to beliefs they're taught as children.

P.P.P.S. After thinking about this for a while, it seems to me that instead of a transient astronomical phenomenon that was only visible over part of the world, it would have been much more helpful to us infidels to write "Allah Akbar" in 1000 km high letters across the face of the moon, and leave them there permanently. Then the astronomical record would not be ambiguous and everyone, even the American Indians on the other side of the world and those of us more than a thousand years later would have the benefit of this demonstration. This would, I think, have avoided a lot of this unpleasant clash of civilizations business.

Answer 3

Stop being religious, and start being intelligent. If the moon was ever split in half, it is inconceivable that it was sliced perfectly in half, then came back. It would not be a weld, it would be a crack. Also, The moon simply could not spilt perfectly. Perhaps you are mixing it up with Miranda, which seems to have shattered and come back together. It is almost impossible to spilt somthing into 2 pieces that perfectly. The moon is not welded.

Answer 4

That means in the year 600 or so the moon split in half. Don't you think there would be some record of that somewhere honey?

Answer 5

NO..............the moon has never been two halves nor will it be. Even when the moon was form from the Orphius theory it never produced two bodies in the night sky. Just one.

Answer 6

It was originally two spheres? Like, a double-scoop of ice cream?

I don't trust something that makes no sense. What are you talking about? More details.

Answer 7

Not a chance..
Nonsense..
Ridiculous..

Answer 8

Where do you get that misinformation from ?

Answer 9

No, that don't sound right. I don't believe it.

Answer 10

No.