What people don't realize is that the embryos being worked on for stem cell research are just leftovers from IVF procedures and cannot be used without the donors consent. The way I see it is that the embryos are either going to be sitting in a freezer forever, or they're going to be used to save lives. I mean, people say that it is morally incorrect to use embryos for scientific research, and I can understand where they are coming from (barely...), but I, for one, find it morally incorrect to let people die or live paralyzed or without limbs when we can clearly do something to help them. By the way, don't give me any of your religious insults because I am religious, myself. Nothing like that can offend me as long as I know I have faith in god.
2007-01-05
08:29:30
·
5 answers
·
asked by
booda2009
5
in
Society & Culture
➔ Other - Society & Culture
Okay, I realize that there are other ways to get stem cells other than embryos, but embryonic stem cells have the potential to become ANYTHING, while adult stem cells can't. Also, about the donor being the person that "would be" born and them "not having a choice," it's not as though that embryo is going to develop either way. It is going to sit in a freezer for years to come, amounting to nothing. It has no potential for human life.
2007-01-05
08:50:46 ·
update #1
Okay, yeah, it is wrong that embryos have to die, I know. If it was an embryo like, being pulled from a pregnant woman's stomach, I'd understand it, but these embryos WILL NOT DEVELOP. THERE IS NO POSSIBLE WAY THAT THIS EMBRYO WILL EVER BECOME A FULLY FUNCTIONAL HUMAN BEING.
2007-01-05
09:15:14 ·
update #2