English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

F.E.M.A (federal emergency management agency ) . A familly is being held in this facility . The familly of asylum seekers payed tax's were well thought of in there community , work hard and were doing well for themselves , there asylum request was denyed and before being told about it had there house stormed at 5 oclock in the morning and they were split up and detained , instead of just being deported . the only child to be born on U.S soil has been taken into care???????? .

heres the link to the footage: http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?doci...

hundreds of these FEMA camps have been built up and down the U.S and bizarely have railway lines close by at each facility or easy access to airports?????.

will the American people that decent be detained in these hundreds of camps in the future .

2007-01-05 06:31:39 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

new link this should work ,http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=5515356061137526953&q=FEMA+concentration+camp

2007-01-05 06:49:15 · update #1

yep watched it earlier and it worked just clicked on this link and it doesnt work ,but you can download and watch it that seems to work .

2007-01-05 07:01:10 · update #2

CJ .hil get you FACTS straight these are controlled FEMA camps look at the executive orders . WHY not just deport them ????????????// they applied they were not defrauding anyone and so youed rtather pay for there stay in a concentration camp than deport them ?? ,you make no sence. wake up and answer questions properly not just the chain of events that go through your head .

2007-01-05 07:06:21 · update #3

also if FEMA take care of people in disasters why did it take them a week to turn up in Orleans after katrina and the few that were there turned away trucks of water tankers of fuel and cut down emergency comunication lines the local sheriff had to put it back up and put armed police along the line , from the mouth of the emergency management president of new orleans on main stream news and it was live . http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=-8368371786391565455&q=katrina+alex+jones fema makes catastrophies worse so they get more power and more funding.

2007-01-05 07:12:29 · update #4

6 answers

There are many secret prison facility's being established across the US. They are being put in place because of the PATRIOT ACT, -the act drafted in to combat terrorism, -ordinary people are being charged with crimes that have nothing to do with terrorism. They will indeed imprison ordinary American's, the US is the only country that imprison's more of it's citizens than any other nation: the US is home to about 5% of the world's population, yet it hold's 22% of the world's prisoner's. Statistics show that as of the middle of 2003, Federal, State, and local facilities in America were holding 2,078,570 people. If we add those on parole or probation, the figure jumps to 6.9 million. For the last 30 years, the number of prisoners has increased annually. The incarcerated population in mid-2003 is a 2.9% rise over the prior year. Currently, one of every 75 men is in the clink. Not only are the absolute numbers sky-high and ever increasing, but the rate of imprisonment keeps climbing into higher nosebeed territory, too. In mid-2003, the US imprisoned 709 people out of every 100,000. A year and a half earlier, that figure was 686. In its mammoth survey of imprisonment from 1974 to 2001, the Bureau of Justice Statistics concluded: ''At yearend 2001, over 5.6 million U.S. adults had ever served time in State or Federal prison, if incareration rates remain unchanged, 6.6% of US residents born in 2001 will go to prison at some time during their lifetime.'' These numbers are not only the highest among industrialized nations, they're the highest in the world. The UK goverments definitive study ''World Prison Population List'' (fourth edition, 2003) gives the following top five prison nation as of the start of 2002: US: 686 inmates per 100,000. Cayman Islands: 664. Russia 638. Belarus: 554. Kazakhstan: 522. In Cuba, the rate is approximately 297. Meanwhile, in lovely Iran, the incarceration rate is 229. The US's northern neighbor rate has about 102, while South of the border, it's 156. England and Wales combined have a rate of 139. The figures are even lower in Scotland (126) and Northern Ireland (62). The rates for other nations that are interesting for comparison purpose's: Ukraine: 406. South Africa: 404. Israel: 153. Spain: 126. Australia: 116. China: 111. Saudi Arabia: 110. Germany: 96. Italy: 95. Uganda: 91. France: 85. Vietnam: 71. Japan: 48. Nigeria: 34. India: 28. So why does the US keep record numbers of its people in cages? The field of criminal justice is wrestling with that question, and the answers are complicated, but among the biggest factors are an ever-increasing number of laws, mandatory sentencing, and the so-called War on Drugs (drug offenders make up around half the federal prison population.

2007-01-05 07:36:07 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Mysteriously--your link isn't able to be accessed on my end.

http://www.progressiveu.org/144800-bushs-new-programs-will-we-see-interment-and-labor-camps-for-muslims-and-fifth-collumn-unloyal-americans

Here's a link about the topic. The sinister nature of these camps, the way they were funded, and the lack of a plausible explanation from the Bush Administration should be a cause of concern for all. Making small economies that can only be sustained by tax dollars directly proportional to how many people are detained encourages the prison-industrial complex. Something we should be trying to get away from.

2007-01-05 06:46:18 · answer #2 · answered by scottyurb 5 · 1 0

First, get your facts straight. FEMA provides temporary housing for disaster victims, not illegal aliens.
Second, these are not camps. FEMA provides the $ to local jurisdictions to lease areas that are suitable for temporary facilities, and these very large travel trailers provided at no cost to the disaster victims but at a cost to the American Taxpayer.
Third, these illegals you describe could not "legally" get this housing for free without fraud - a major felony.
Fourth, if you wanted to catch some who is defrauding the government for tens of thousands of taxpayer dollars, would you tell them you are coming?
On the surface, your question plays on the sympathy of the "do unto others" but would YOU pay for their living and housing voluntarily or would you want the government to pay with money they take in Taxes. And if the latter is true, do you want your taxes raised to the social welfare state %, i.e. 50% of your earnings?

FEMA takes care of disaster victims and not illegals...that belongs to the ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement)

2007-01-05 06:57:50 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Liberals will blindly do, or say besides the fact that their chief tell them to do, via fact of this the are liberals, they don't have the brains to think of on their own, so i'm beneficial they are going to circulate into those camps. however the actual possibility to united statesa. isn't this muslim Hussein Obama yet a citizenry able to entrusting a guy like him with the Presidency. it will be some distance easier to cut back and undo the follies of an Obama presidency than to repair the needed uncomplicated experience and sturdy judgment to a wicked voters keen to have this style of guy for their president. the subject is plenty deeper and lots greater severe than Hussein Obama, who's a trifling symptom of what ails united statesa. . Blaming the prince of the fools shouldn't blind absolutely everyone to the super confederacy of fools that made him their prince. The Republic can stay to tell the story a Hussein Obama, who's, in spite of each thing, in basic terms a fool. that's way less possibly to stay to tell the story a large number of fools alongside with people who made him their president.

2016-12-12 04:37:13 · answer #4 · answered by trip 4 · 0 0

All these FEMA camps are very unsettling. Why isn't the media going off this this? Not the US media, they're pathetic, but the international media?

2007-01-05 08:20:08 · answer #5 · answered by Webber 5 · 1 0

If you listen to Alex Jones you would know they are you.

2007-01-05 06:35:47 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers