2007-01-05 05:09:18 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Cricket
Sir Isaac Vivian Alexander Richards former West Indian cricketer.
He scored 119 runs(113 balls,10 4s & 4 6s) & took 5 wickets conceding 41 runs in the New Zealand v West Indies Rothmans Cup 1986/87 (1st ODI)
Venue Carisbrook, Dunedin on 18th March 1987 (50-over match)
2007-01-07 04:18:59 · answer #1 · answered by mousumi_19 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Vivian Richards of West Indies is the cricketer who scored a century and took 5 wickets in a One Day International match.
In the first one day international match of 1986/87 series played between West Indies and New Zeland at Carisbrook, Dunedin on 18th March 1987, he scored 119 runs from 113 balls with the help of 10 fours and 4 sixers and also took 5 wickets from 10 overs conceding 41 runs.
Please check the following link for score card of that match:
http://www.cricinfo.com/db/ARCHIVE/1980S/1986-87/WI_IN_NZ/WI_NZ_ODI1_18MAR1987.html
2007-01-05 15:25:33 · answer #2 · answered by vakayil k 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Viv Richards
2007-01-05 17:03:36 · answer #3 · answered by Anirudh T 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I truthfully did no longer get a wager to observe those fits in touch so ought to no longer have complete insights. Sehwag had no reason to withdraw his attraction, he grew to become into interior of complete rights. It grew to become into thoroughly interior the spirit of the sport, what the batsman grew to become into attempting to do grew to become into no longer. no desire for a warning the two through the bowler. If the batsman does not want to get out then stay interior the crease. If it grew to become into sparkling he grew to become into working to make a run and then while observed that he ought to be out. will improve his palms that he has an harm then he ought to settle for out. yet there is likewise earnings of the doubt, he surely ought to have pulled something or actual harm. If he's injured no longer likely he will dive its stupid. Hussey isn't one in each and every of those participant from his checklist who could try something humorous. he's a elementary participant. intentionally or by possibility bowlers shouldn't stand interior the middle. Batsmen ought to run to attain, so as that they must be off the pitch in the present day. i do no longer understand what the situations have been, yet while bowler is on the pitch a rule ought to be made batsman shall no longer settle for out. Bowlers ought to be of the pitch. Its batsman's genuine no longer the bowlers. together with his palms on the hips what grew to become into he doing status there interior the 1st place? Umpires ought to admonish such bowlers regardless of who it somewhat is. i do no longer understand relating to something of the situations, even yet it somewhat is being reported Tendulkar did no longer even difficulty floor his bat. And with or with out Lee status there he could've been out. This regulation ought to be clarified now IMO regardless. That if bowler intentionally or by possibility stands on the pitch hindering the batsman. The batsman shall no longer settle for out. I continuously hate that.
2016-11-26 21:42:19 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Mark waugh or ian botham
2007-01-05 14:32:30 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
sachin ... 5 -32 n he scored a hundered ....
2007-01-05 14:49:05 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
micky ponting
2007-01-07 21:02:50 · answer #7 · answered by darius 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
search on google buddy
2007-01-05 05:37:18 · answer #8 · answered by Arun J 2 · 0⤊ 3⤋
SACHIN RAMESH TENDULKAR
2007-01-07 15:50:52 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
just click here
http://www.cricshare.com
2007-01-06 09:25:39 · answer #10 · answered by tere yaad 1 · 0⤊ 2⤋