English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

good that would mean people would be somthing like ants just working automaticly as a group to accomplish somthing and nobody would be in charge it would be almost robotic . The same thing goes for evil I think you could not favor anyone because you hate everyone but yourself so you would only want to destroy everything because there would be no pity or caring just everyone slaving for you and yourself surviving .

2007-01-05 04:27:21 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Social Science Psychology

4 answers

what's wrong?why you are so sad?
i think we are fine this way if we work work work we will be machines not people and if evil people became unit then we will be doomed.but this will never happen there have to be two sides so that people can choose and according to their choice they are good or evil

2007-01-05 04:39:46 · answer #1 · answered by mony 2 · 0 0

you seem to be a bit focussed on your idea of pure goodness and pure evil. Goodness is a perception you have about an event or happening, Pure evil is a perception you have about an event or happening. What you perceive as good, could be conceived as evil by someone else, For Example you may think the Taliban in Afghanistan are Evil, They would think the western invaders are Evil. You can have your reasons why you are right , as do they. But someones thoughts do not make them true, they only classify them to yourself as you perceive them.

Also relative good and Bad (Evil?) exist, if only to show the comparison...How can you know what happiness is, if you have never been sad? How happy you are can only be measured against how you have been recently. If you were really sad a week ago, you might feel very happy now, but if you were happy last week, you might feel happy or sadder than before but your present situation requires something to be measured against.

Even warm water seems cooler when you get used to it.

2007-01-05 04:49:10 · answer #2 · answered by bob shark 7 · 0 0

organic is a competent word yet am not incredibly helpful that it applies descriping good or evil. If basically considered one of them exists meaning that different do.I do have confidence that for the time of existence there's a balancing equipment a area and its opposite. the way i see your question is with the aid of evaluating 2 creatures not the author with a definite creature. What i mean is that God is above such assessment. greater to it there is two recommendations on the thank you to discover an answer. One on a private point what a definite man or woman evaluate as organic evil or organic goodness and that very lots relies upon on the internal maximum direction in existence and what we've experienced in it. 2 if all Humanity agreed on what's organic eveil or organic goodness. Which made me ask your self if the two considered one of them confirmed up on an identical time starting to be a conflict wont a team factor with the aid of eveil and yet another team factor with the aid of goodness even a 0.33 team taking no factors in any respect. Now in case you asked anybody of them what do you think of they might answer to approximately that's evil or and that's goodness ?. may well be even some human beings will evaluate the party it incredibly is self as organic evil or goodness. i think it is all approximately factor of perspectives.

2016-10-30 02:02:38 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

To the "pure", all things are pure !

2007-01-08 12:25:42 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers