English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

13 answers

People who identify themselves as conservatives and liberals are usually radicals because few can be either of those all of the time. We are almost all moderates with conservative views on some things (family, taxes, etc) and liberal views on others (social justice, civil rights, etc.). We are a moderate country and that is why few things change quickly. The Dems used anti war slogans nationally but few of the new Congressmen campaigned agains the war totally. The new legislators are mostly moderates and it will be slow to change, otherwise, Nancy Pelosi would have ended the war yesterday. Did not, will not. Radical right wingers and left wingers X each other out in elections. thanks god for that.

2007-01-05 02:44:43 · answer #1 · answered by Tom W 6 · 2 0

A "liberal" as far because of the fact the US is worried is a reasonably cutting-side term. the 1st liberals as an prepared political circulation got here approximately around the turn of the 20 th century as a reaction to the Robber Barons and Bolshiviks and have been the beggining of the middle type. perhaps Teddy Roosevelt became the 1st liberal president? He ran on a "bust the trusts" slogan and he became a republican. people who supported England have been commonplace as "loyalists", people who supported the south in the process the civil warfare have been democrats or dixiecrats, and the Quakers consistently have been antislavery and additionally you will possibly be able to't get greater conservative than them. i'm no supporter of the GOP i'm only asserting a number of your misconceptions. Liberal is a grimy word right this moment because of the fact it is been hijacked with the aid of the Democrat party that's definately not LIBERAL. The thought of political correctness and revisionist historic previous have been initially a Stalin/Bolshevik coverage. Hitler used them too. As do people who declare to be Liberal interior the US right this moment. in case you have been to translate the words right this moment to their unique meanings it would be something like this Liberal = Socialist Neo-Cons = Robber Baron/Elitist Conservatives = individualists = they may well be the actual classical liberals and additionally you will not see any of them on television or linked to a political party. ask your self does and autonomous conservative incredibly need to work out each thing stay an identical? Or are they annoying accountabilty and alter? you're a classical liberal as am I and maximum human beings, we've not have been given any representation.

2016-10-30 01:53:10 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Well I don't personally consider myself a liberal or a conservative, but I can honestly say that I don't care much fo Bush. If the United States wanted to impeach clinton for getting a BJ and having an affair, because it as immoral, then how can lying to an entire nation to benefit himself NOT be an impeachable offense? Please don't sit and say that everyone who has an opinion is ignorant, or lacks maturity, because it is simply NOT the case. When the entire middle class is wiped out, and there is no middle ground a lot of these "conservative" people will probably be feeling a little bit more liberal when they have to beg money from family members, or stand in lines to get food for themselves or their children. We really need to look at all sides of the issue and realize that the vast majority of government is out for themselves, no matter what lable they staple to their heads, be it conservative or liberal. If it's not good for them, then it's not good for anyone! We bring them into office we should really start demanding more from them

2007-01-05 02:51:23 · answer #3 · answered by Jennifer T 1 · 0 1

I don't blindly follow the "hate Bush" goose-stepping loonies. I put a great deal of thought into it, and I agree with them.

And what exactly is a "goose-stepping loony", anyway?

2007-01-05 02:41:12 · answer #4 · answered by jasdlkdfhd 3 · 2 2

Probably the same reasons that conservatives followed the "hate Clinton" goose stepping loonies!

2007-01-05 02:43:55 · answer #5 · answered by Frankies1 3 · 2 2

I do not "follow" any one and I hate this fraud of a Deserter and false Christian because of all of the damage he has done to this otherwise great country of ours!

George W. Bush has done more damage to this country then if we had 1,000 terrorists destroy every building in New York City!

And Americans will be paying for it for the next decade if not longer!



Too bad you have your wool growing over your eyes or you would be able to see this. -

2007-01-05 02:55:23 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

9/11 wasnt a conspiracy, it was a tragic event that was milked for all its worth by the government. i dont hate bush, im mad at the government. if bush wanted to do something stupid, checks and balances should make it not happen...its our government that didnt work

2007-01-05 02:48:04 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Bush is a bit of an easy target given his limited intelect and I don't think its just pinkos that go for him. They may be the loudest as the right, while seeing the guy's failings don't want to shoot their own guy (yet!).

2007-01-05 02:42:02 · answer #8 · answered by patti_felz 4 · 1 2

I think its just because they hate our President and want American failure and defeat as long as it isn't a liberal in office when we lose.
Sad.

2007-01-05 02:53:40 · answer #9 · answered by Dave t 1 · 1 0

Because that's what they're trained to do. Instead of having a mind of thier own, they follow all the Liberal propoganda. Like 9/11, ooooooooooohhhhh it's a conspiracy!

2007-01-05 02:41:48 · answer #10 · answered by marieandlucaspape 3 · 2 4

fedest.com, questions and answers