English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

11 answers

Oh yes... Honestly it never seemed a war against terrorism,but a war against Islam,from the moment Bush attacked Iraq,instead of North Korea...There were no proofs that Iraq had any WMD,the UN inspectors said that they haven't found anything there and still Bush attacked it...while North Korea was proudly spreading the news that they have nuclear weapons and that they are ready to use it anytime...
And now,US keeps threatening Iran that they might use military actions if Iran doesn't renounce at something they have every right to:nuclear energy,but in the meantime US allows Israel to use uranium bombs in Lebanon...

2007-01-05 02:33:40 · answer #1 · answered by Tinkerbell05 6 · 0 1

In the beginning, I persuaded myself that It's not a war against Muslims but it's a war against Terrorism. But now, I have changed my mind because I have seen many proofs. Bush has called Muslims many names, like: Islamo-fascists and Radicals. And once he said before invading Iraq: It's a CRUSADE war..... it's a crusade war on terrorism. Moreover, all the countries he invaded are Muslim countries

2007-01-08 06:21:22 · answer #2 · answered by MagicWand 3 · 0 0

I really tire of questions like this. Does your absolute hate for Bush blind you to reality, or are you really this dense? Exactly who's on the crusade here? I've yet to hear Bush say he won't rest until all the world has converted to Christianity. On the other hand, I have heard, many times, mullahs and ayotallahs and regular run-of-the-mill terrrorists state that their goal, in fact their duty, is to convert the whole world to islam. Personally, I have no wish to become a muslim, so I thank God everyday that a we have a man like George Bush protecting my right to worship in a way of my choosing, or not to worship at all for that matter. I don't know. Maybe you'll wake up one of these days.

2007-01-05 02:54:35 · answer #3 · answered by Knowitall 3 · 1 1

Of course not. It was a Muslim terrorist group that attacked the US, not authentic Muslims, and Bush has said that repeatedly. If we are against Muslims, why are we helping Afghanistan and Iraq to recover from tyrannical regimes and work toward prosperity? Why are US soldiers building schools and clinics in Muslim countries? Why are US troops helping to rebuild infrastructure destroyed by terrorists? Why do US soldiers, in their time off, volunteer to teach sports to the local children? Is it because we are against the people in those towns?

2007-01-05 03:17:33 · answer #4 · answered by The First Dragon 7 · 0 1

No..... Bush has started a "Crusade" to gain control of all the rich oil countries.......In the name of terrorism.

2007-01-05 03:40:12 · answer #5 · answered by Mary B 2 · 0 0

i don't think of he intends to be against muslims, yet fairly terrorists. regrettably, the way he conducts his warfare on Terror (racial profiling, his Christian attitude, invasion of muslim countries, a sparkling rampant prejudice against muslims) , many muslims experience that he, and US as an entire, is, in certainty, against them as a team. the challenge with it incredibly is greater recruits with the aid of corrupt muslim leaders.

2016-10-30 01:51:03 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

I'll answer this question with another. Which religon operates the highest terrorist agency in the world? umm... MUSLIMS! What religon is some of the most feared men in the world? umm... MUSLIM! So we are just protecting the U.S. by getting rid of terrorists.

2007-01-05 02:34:15 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

whats the difference, muslims and terrorist are one and the same thing.

2007-01-05 14:14:43 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

yes!! let bush stay a bush!!!

2007-01-05 02:28:32 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

SHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!! You'll spill the beans!OOPS!

2007-01-05 08:49:20 · answer #10 · answered by Simplicity 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers