English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

That you must take out all of them? The war on terrorist is not just in Afganistan so quit bitching about going into Iraq.

2007-01-05 02:19:06 · 10 answers · asked by neoconammo 2 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

10 answers

haha

you just lumped all of IRAN in with a couple of terrorists

just shows, again, how stupid you trolls really are

2007-01-05 02:21:14 · answer #1 · answered by BigD 6 · 4 1

Do you believe everything you're told?In bush's axis if evil speech, we were told of this evil trifecta. "Our second goal is to prevent regimes that sponsor terror from threatening America or our friends and allies with weapons of mass destruction. Some of these regimes have been pretty quiet since September the 11th. But we know their true nature. North Korea is a regime arming with missiles and weapons of mass destruction, while starving its citizens.

Iran aggressively pursues these weapons and exports terror, while an unelected few repress the Iranian people's hope for freedom.

Iraq continues to flaunt its hostility toward America and to support terror. The Iraqi regime has plotted to develop anthrax, and nerve gas, and nuclear weapons for over a decade. This is a regime that has already used poison gas to murder thousands of its own citizens -- leaving the bodies of mothers huddled over their dead children. This is a regime that agreed to international inspections -- then kicked out the inspectors. This is a regime that has something to hide from the civilized world"-George w bush,state of the union address,2001
.Now Iran and north Korea made no bones about their nuclear plans, but we go after Saddam. We weren't going to steal oil, the other gulf states wouldn't stand for it. The only logical explanation is their intent was to drive up the cost of oil, so the domestic producers and refiners could make billions. Bring back the good old days of the oil boom. The one variable they overlooked was the idiot in the white house.Now we're mired in a two front war, big tactical no-no.Ask the Germans about that. Iran and n Korea aren't dumb, they know that we can't do anything to them, so they continue w/their programs. Now here are. The mightiest Nation on earth, impotent. That is why we can't do anything about the other two members of the axis. Brilliant plan George.

2007-01-05 12:13:10 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Saddam had nothing to do with 9/11 or any other terrorist act.
Bush took him out to finish the job his father started and hopefully
get control of Iraq's oil. The "war on terror" is just a slogan used
to manipulate the public,while Osama is still running around free
and clear.Bush wouldn't dare to worry the Saudi royal family by
arresting their cousin.

2007-01-05 10:33:08 · answer #3 · answered by Alion 7 · 1 0

If we're going to "take all of them out", then let's really take them ALL out. Maybe Bush didn't invade Iraq for oil; unfortunately, since we haven't taken much action against the countless other regimes that are at least as bad as Saddam's Iraq, people tend to be suspicious of that fact that the only terrorists we're rooting out are ones in oil-producing countries. Iraq most likely had ties with Al-qaeda, and most certainly had human rights abuses; however, there are many other countries that also have them.

2007-01-05 10:32:05 · answer #4 · answered by MaybePOTUS 2 · 0 1

We certainly are sending a lot of soldiers and civilians to death to achieve the goal. Remember that we are the invaders. So even those who like us the most---don't want us there.
I can complain because this doesn't seem like the America I fought for.

2007-01-05 10:29:34 · answer #5 · answered by metoo 7 · 0 0

Then what is Bush doing about this?

Isn;t he president? Wasn't the GOP in power for six years? Perhaps you should look to the failure of the GOP leadership, who were too interested in lining their own pockets than concerned with running this country

2007-01-05 10:24:51 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

there are 1 billion
Mrs. Clinton in 2008
Mr. Obana in 2016

2007-01-05 12:54:19 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

so where's osama? apparently cons can't understand he must be taken out. bush said he ain't important.

2007-01-05 10:29:20 · answer #8 · answered by kissmy 4 · 1 0

peanut allergies, car accidents involving deer, and lightning strikes each kill more americans each year than terrorists.


http://infowars.com/articles/terror/peanuts_kill_more_americans_than_terrorists.htm

2007-01-06 04:48:52 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

by your logic...we should just take out the rest of the world....THEY LOOKED AT US FUNNY... @.o

youre pretty stupid

2007-01-05 10:28:36 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers