English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

13 answers

No, not for national security, it is to further someones agenda. Think about it, I am sure there will be another attack in the future, aren't you. I cannot understand why some people are complacent about giving up their rights in the name of security. To me when you do give up a right, the terrorist have won. That is their whole objective, to alter our way of life. Well they have done that and we are not any safer then we was on 9/10.

2007-01-05 02:02:38 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 5 0

it somewhat isn't any longer a sparkling decision of this or that. The shape isn't endangering us with particular dying through terrorist. Nor will forsaking the form in it somewhat is entirety assure us perfect secure practices from terrorist. i could say if we've been informed that our government can no longer defend us from terrorist with out forsaking section or all the form then we ought to continuously do some issues. a million. Take a no longer common seem at our government. Are they telling the reality? 2. evaluate the terrorist. Are they actually that useful? So useful that they could harm the framework of our usa and not something we are able to do will circumvent it? 3. If the above is all genuine then we ought to chosen. Abandon our rights and freedom to allow our government to do because it somewhat is going to or shop our freedom and take our possibilities and combat terrorism besides as we could additionally as no longer destroying each and everything we stand for. with the aid of fact as quickly as you initiate giving up your rights, you have few rights to self secure practices and much less skill to preserve what freedom you have left. as quickly as you bypass down that course you maintain going. you are not getting rights and freedom back back and not using a combat. Our forefathers had to combat for what freedom and rights we've.

2016-11-26 21:09:22 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The constitution was written over 2 hundred years ago, when the world was much bigger than it is now. I compare what was then is like horse and buggy is to the space shuttle is today. Time has changed and just as ammendments were made in the constitution through the years I'm afraid the time has come when changes will have to be made to Fit the times.

2007-01-05 02:03:12 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

What freedoms have you personally lost? I really don't think the mail thing is going to matter do you? If they open the mail, they have 48 hours to report to court and explain why. I really don't think they are interested in your collection notices.

2007-01-05 02:05:49 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Heck yes. About that Constitution... well, I kind of thought it was there for a reason. I'm so confused as to how this happened!

2007-01-05 02:01:56 · answer #5 · answered by Cedar 5 · 4 0

They have been compromised, in the name of national security, though i don't think it has anything to do with national security, it has everything to do with addiction to power.

2007-01-05 01:56:56 · answer #6 · answered by niko 3 · 5 1

Before Admin gets in, Ethics must get in! In the absence of Ethics, everything is possible–no exception!.-

Ciao.......John-John.

2007-01-05 04:25:11 · answer #7 · answered by John-John 7 · 1 0

Yes, absolutely.

2007-01-05 02:02:24 · answer #8 · answered by Third Uncle 5 · 2 0

Without a doubt in this matter

2007-01-05 01:58:14 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 5 0

No. I don't think there was Islamic fanatics around when the constitution was drafted was there?

2007-01-05 01:58:55 · answer #10 · answered by neoconammo 2 · 0 5

fedest.com, questions and answers