Marty Lawless had been driving a cab in Chicago for a large company. “If I could only lay my hands on twenty thousand bucks” he marked, “I could really make out. I could get a cab and license of my.”
Jim Craven, who had attended law school said to him, “I’ll loan you the money. Use it for two years and then you can pay it back when you want, up to ten years.
But Marty was hesitant
Jim spoke up “Now hold on. We will make it carry one percent interest and you can sign a promissory note if you want. How’s that? ”
Marty replied, “Thanks a lot, Jim. It will sure give me a boost.”
Jim then raised a glass and said to everyone present, “All right, Let’s drink to the world’s newest independent cab driver!”
Marty resigned from his job. He also recommended Craven to a cab driver friend, Bill Short. Short had recently been rear ended by a beer truck and had suffered whiplash and other injuries.His cab, which he owned, was totaled.
But a few days later he received a letter from Craven in which Craven wrote he had had a “big deal” come up and did not have the money to loan now.
A few days thereafter Bill Short called to thank Lawless for referring him to Craven. Short advised Lawless that Craven had almost immediately negotiated a $500,000 settlement for him, as the beer distributor had wanted to avoid publicity from a.
Short also advised that Craven received a 40% contingent fee for his efforts.
Lawless has hastened to your office after learning that he cannot get his old job back and now awaits your advice.
(A)Discuss potential causes of action Lawless may have against Craven and their likelihood of success.
(B)If Lawless should prevail how would his likely monetary recovery be measured and why?
2007-01-05
01:50:09
·
3 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Law & Ethics