i love you sweety ... i anit gotta say it cause you said it.. your preaching to the choir honey. cause bush and his folks are demons and demons hate people. love you
2007-01-05 01:48:54
·
answer #1
·
answered by ♥lois c♥ ☺♥♥♥☺ 6
·
1⤊
5⤋
Oooh, you hit all the DNC talking points! It's too bad your criticism is not based on fact.
1. No lies re: WMD
2. Tax cuts have spurred the economy
3. Deficits - neither the time nor space to educate you on budgets and fiscal policy. Suffice it to say that you probably haven't the least clue about this, but are just parroting a talking point.
4. No-bid contracts - there's nothing illegal about it
5. Torture - didn't happen. Inform yourself as to the definition of torture versus aggressive interrogation techniques.
6. Wiretapping. So, you think enemy transmissions should be protected?
7. Katrina. Are you saying Bush caused Katrina? The federal response might not have been the most competent, but we've never before experienced a disaster of that magnitude. And the local help in Louisiana was quite incompetent (Nagin, Blank-o)
8. There are no "new facts" about any warning of imminent attack - this was debunked by the 9/11 investigation.
9. Exit Strategy - words by people who have no clue - the only time you need an "exit strategy" is when you want to cut 'n' run.
10. In more danger from terrorism? Are you saying we weren't in danger when 9/11 happened? WTF?
11. Being beaten in Afghanistan? Not so. And it's the UN/NATO people that want to pussyfoot around with the Taliban.
12. Saddam execution was not a US action.
So basically, you are all riled up and spouting crap based on ignorance and lies. How sad.
2007-01-05 02:15:33
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋
about as ignorant as those who do not help the president. this is an OPINION, no extra, no a lot less, and it does not denote intelligence. enable's see: What lies that led to the Iraq warfare? WMD's were got here upon. Tax cuts? Oh sure, how terrible, even inspite of the indisputable fact that the final numbers for DOW were a record extreme, and a couple of further extreme records were set considering Bush grew to change into president... huge deficits? What do you assume when we are at warfare? No-settlement bids? that couldn't something new. Torture? What torture? Oh, you recommend the torture at Abu Ghraib? The torture that had not something in any respect to do with Bush or his administration? typhoon Katrina? That change into the STATE authorities'S duty. The mayor of latest Orleans, and the governor of Louisiana tousled. sure, there change into earlier caution, really, to 9/11. yet there change into NO information coming in on WHO change into going to attack, the position they were going to attack, even as they were going to attack, or HOW they were going to attack. How are we extra at risk? there have been 8 efficient terrorist attacks lower than Clinton. there is really 2 that were efficient considering Bush has been president, and one change into in great Britain. considering even as is the Taliban being "allowed" again into skill? we are not being "beaten" in Afghanistan, we merely desire extra troops there! Wiretapping? Oh sure, the wiretapping that continues to be legal, and in no way exceptional. a similar wiretapping that has prevented terrorist attacks. Oh, shame on Bush, he's meant to enable us be attacked. and also you call the human beings who help the president an fool. The least you may want to do is arise with stuff it truly is real. Edit: by ways, i'm not a Republican or a Democrat; my voting registration card says NON-AFFILIATED, and my voting record is chop up fairly a lot 50/50. Oh, and that i'm impartial on both Bush, and the warfare in Iraq. So i can't be noted as a accepted Bush supporter, or a warmonger!
2016-12-01 20:58:02
·
answer #3
·
answered by barnas 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Keep drinking the cool-aid. You should really stop believing every conspiracy theory you come across.
The only thing in your entire question I will address is the "no exit strategy." Name a war in which we had an exit strategy. There wasn't one for WWI or WWII. As for the rest of your diatribe, you really need to educate yourself on the facts. Nothing you called a fact in your "question" has anything to back it therefore you have no facts just opinions. If you think they are facts you need to list your sources so that we can all see the deluded place you get this information from.
2007-01-05 01:48:45
·
answer #4
·
answered by Rorshach4u 3
·
2⤊
3⤋
How do you convince an idiot to pull his hand out of the fire? With facts. Unfortunately, your rant is short on them. You're right about post-war Iraq. You're right there were tax cuts. You're also right about the deficit. Iraq hung Saddam, not the US. Everything else is opinion.
2007-01-05 01:52:30
·
answer #5
·
answered by JB 6
·
2⤊
2⤋
First, how can you blame a person............any person for a hurricane?? FEMA screwed up the fixing part, but no one can be blamed for a Nature occurance. Bush did what every other man on the planet would do. Let a woman handle it and it would be different. If not, then you do better. I'd love to see it.
2007-01-05 01:51:34
·
answer #6
·
answered by FireBug 5
·
1⤊
3⤋
90% of the stuff you list the president doesnt control. You need to turn off your computer and learn about how our govt works.
How ignorant are the people who think the president controls govt spending? How ignorant are the people who think Bush created the hurricanes?
2007-01-05 01:44:49
·
answer #7
·
answered by godoompah 5
·
4⤊
4⤋
It has nothing to do with George Bush, but the party he belongs to. If Bush was a Dem. and did the things that he has done, the Republicans would be calling for his impeachment.
2007-01-05 01:47:31
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
5⤋
You can't convince them...they are beyond help.
Their weak minds have been brainwashed to the point of no return!!
2007-01-05 01:44:40
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
4⤋
How do I dignify this crap with an answer? Easy, I don't. Thanks for the 2 points.
2007-01-05 01:46:31
·
answer #10
·
answered by ♥ Tori ♥ 5
·
3⤊
4⤋