What is the difference between a circumcised man & one who is not in making love?

Answer 1

The glans of a cut man is kind of dry and rough compared to the glans of an intact man, so mutilated men almost always seem to need lube. Intact men have this gliding action that is much more pleasurable than the jabs of the cut man. But the worst is that many mutilated men, especially as they get past 30 or so, can't climax from normal sex and have to pull out and finish by hand. That's really hard for a woman to accept, as she feels inadequate.

If the man I love had been mutilated by his parents, I would not hold it against him. But fortunately his parents were enlightened enough to leave him whole, and the experience is silky, sensual, great in all ways. He doesn't stink, and he's never had any kind of infection there, and no it is not disgusting to go down on a whole man - it's all in women's imaginations! The foreskin is as clean as any other body part as long as it's washed like any other body part! I have never seen, felt, or smelled ANY smegma on my husband - ever.

Answer 2

Most women prefer a man with a circumcised penis because it may move inside them in a less friction-based manner. Once he is inside the vagina, the circumcised penis may easily slide up and down to create pleasure for both partners.

There are several advantages for circumcised men when it comes to sexuality. First is that circumcised male have no need to worry about daily cleansing of his foreskin. Meanwhile, men with an uncircumcised foreskin must take special care to move it up and down and clean it inside its covered areas to avoid odors or serious infection because of material buildup. Consequently, there might be some bacteria and germs that could surface thus affect their sexual health.

Safe sex is an added concern for uncircumcised men and their partners. Men with foreskins occasionally have difficulty finding the right condom or keeping one on during penetrative sexual activity. That spells trouble in bed as well as generates unneeded anxiety.

As for the sensitivity of the penis, no medical or physiological study has proved that circumcision reduces sensitivity, opposed to common belief. It is completely FALSE that circumcision reduces penis sensitivity. The American Academy of Paediatrics (AAP) confirms this on their web site; have a look at: http://www.aap.org/pubed/zzzjzmemh4c.htm

Several studies carried out by prestigious research bodies have concluded that uncircumcised penises are more prone to infections and contraction of STD's, including AIDS-HIV. Circumcised men have been proved to be up 70% less likely to be infected than those who are uncircumcised. Have a look at this site: http://www.torontodailynews.com/index.php/HealthNews/2006121404Circumcision

As for women, studies also show that circumcision also protects female partners from AIDS-HIV and other STD's. Browse this article: http://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/Press_releases/2006/02_08_06.html

Circumcision is an easy and nowadays painless procedure, which has many benefits, and virtually no risks.

Circumcision is NOT an amputation. Circumcision is NOT comparable at all to female circumcision, which is something completely different.

Circumcision rates are INCREASING nowadays, both in the United States and overseas. Many African and South American countries with little circumcision tradition are starting to promote the procedure to help to reduce the AIDS-HIV infection rates.

Answer 3

the main difference is the feeling of sensitivity. i am not that way and i a alot more sensitivity when i make love to a woman.. also during oral sex the skin does get in the way and my lady friends need to pull it down to get to the head to stimulate that area..other wise nothing except hygiene

Answer 4

I never noticed any difference as far as feeling goes during intercourse, but the real difference is with oral sex at least with me.

Answer 5

I am told that a man that isn't cicumcised is more sensitive. Other than that nothing, once there's an erection you can't hardly tell.

Answer 6

Nothing different with sensation from a female pov but asthetically they are different.

Answer 7

I never noticed a difference.