http://uk.news.yahoo.com/05012007/344/wanted-photos-breach-rights.html
they dont want to release the pictures of two escaped murders as it may violate their human rights. what the hell?!
What about the people who may now be at risk from these dangerous criminals? what about our human rights??
this country is stupid.
2007-01-05 00:17:03 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
"Photographs of named people that are in police possession are classed as data and their release is restricted by law"
What the? They're not IN police possession, they've escaped!
2007-01-05 00:35:47 · answer #1 · answered by spaacedogg 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
yep it sends major mixed messages people get pissed off and then the actual rights you should be standing up for are slowly being eroded in the back ground , dont get sucked in this is done to manipulate and brain wash i agree its total bullshit its a state of emergency dangerous guys are on the streets praps the whole point of the story is to warn people so why not show there faces .
update : why the hell are convicted murderers doing in an opn prison
also beaware alot of dis info is being put out to terrorise the population into giving there rights away , how do you know there are 2 murderers missing when there are no pictures of these freaks.
i sugest you dont forget about this single story and find out what is going on because generally these storys are put out then over a week the story fades into the background and then you find out it was all bullshit , but then that is not covered roperly and then who cares anyway.
click on this link: http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=5515356061137526953&q=Fema+Concentration+camp tells you how and why.
update : why the hell are convicted murderers doing in an open prison? it also says they only put photos out if there a danger to society, there murderers no? and also they escaped to months ago how cavalier by the police is that !!!! as again none of it entails any logic or common sence .
update: and then they show the the pictures, what row why not show them in the first place just a total sham and another attack on the public opinion of human rights.
2007-01-05 00:39:36 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I propose that the top shrink for contributions be carried out away with, and that the utmost payouts in retirement nevertheless stay as they are, adjusted for inflation. Social secure practices isn't a "supply away" software yet one that all of us make a contribution to love a discount fees plan, and may well be shielded from different makes use of with the aid of the government. Do you settle or disagree and why? while you're so nervous approximately it then why do not you; first positioned it back into the internal maximum sector and make to have been no can take out funds from it for his or her very own activity, 2nd pay back each penny you have borrowed from the two Social secure practices and Medicare, 0.33 take the unlawful immigrants off of it and people who come over here yet in no way paid a penny to it, and finally have it an identical for each man or woman; in different words government officers are to take part in it and in the event that they elect something greater they do it on their very own without the tax payers investment it?yet, the economic stytem feeding the imbalances had in no way been incredibly replaced. They, a team of pupils, stated that one and all fees of activity may well be 3% or much less for each man or woman to grow to be wealthy if needed (that would desire to be actual additionally to taces). the wonderful economic subject may well be, they stated, whilst there have been no fees of activity. Why not attempt this answer? the wealthy might nevertheless be wealthy. My question is: whilst soial secure practices turns right into a challenge linked to federal bills, why not artwork with a balanced or income budget and spend no greater beneficial than is provided in, as any kin has to attempt for? Why not ban all loobying presents as a manner to get rules that serve the country? God bless usa.
2016-10-30 01:42:10 · answer #3 · answered by doti 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If we aren't careful, the U.S. will follow suit shortly.
For those keeping score at home, this is an issue I'm 'conservative' on. Once convicted, you lose practically all of your rights,including the right to privacy. Basic human rights and citizen's rights are two different things. Some liberals try to blur that line, for some unknown reason.
2007-01-05 00:21:47 · answer #4 · answered by Devil Dog '73 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
It's nice to know there are people out there, apart from my close friends, who think the same as me. Keep questioning the crazy logic of this country. When they are captured, then sentenced and then released they will be housed next to a primary school.
2007-01-05 00:30:05 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
I'm always waiting for someone to sue the person who makes these kind of decisions, because they weren't forewarned, etc etc.
It seems to me that if the police know there's a burglar in the area and you get burgled (for example) someone should be held accountable. Or a paedophile, or a drug user.
2007-01-05 00:25:38 · answer #6 · answered by True Blue Brit 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
When are people in the country ever gonna learn, to many ffing do gooders..You should loose your automatic human rights the minute you decide to do something that is against the law, or against our country, no matter how menial it is...
This country has gone to pot, and we all know who to thank for that
2007-01-05 00:33:17 · answer #7 · answered by X_Angie_p_X 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
spot on...the only way i see out of this ridiculous farce that britain has become is with complete anarchy...people are so frustrated with common sense and values not being implemented..i thought we voted for polititions to run the country as we wish. its time decent people were listened to.
2007-01-05 02:50:54 · answer #8 · answered by slsvenus 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Wow! That is stupid. Does the public not NEED to know what ESCAPED MURDERERS in their area might look like?
2007-01-05 00:21:21 · answer #9 · answered by Timothy M 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Dont worry my friend, Plans are already afoot to release all convicts from prison as its not fair they should be locked up, bless their murdering, raping and thieving little socks!
2007-01-05 00:28:32 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋