English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-01-04 22:32:23 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

13 answers

Brutally tough. I have to say Newt Gingrich because he helped boot the Dems out of power in 1994 and they know he can do it again. He speaks on Fox News all the time, so he qualifies.

2007-01-05 04:43:26 · answer #1 · answered by Chainsaw 6 · 2 0

I am a Independent, but vote mostly conservative. I do not like Rush Limbaugh, am not a Savage fan, and get a kick out of Coulter, but I think shes a little over the top. (okay way over) I do like Fox news as they are the only network that puts both sides up and lets them both yell. Those that don't like Fox are the lefts version of Coulter. Anything they do not agree with is propaganda. Way over the top. That may be why Fox has more viewers than all three of the "big" three, plus CNBC and CNN put together.

2007-01-05 07:36:52 · answer #2 · answered by mark g 6 · 4 0

Since when does wanting truth, honesty, and decency make one a "liberal"? By saying that it takes a "liberal" to be bothered by lies and hate speech, you are admitting that "conservatives" are dumb or complicit enough to willingly accept and believe lies and take part in criminal wars. Given events of the past thirteen years, that's demonstrably true.

The neo-convict who bothers so-called "liberals" is Rupert Murdoch. He created a network and a media environment that encourages and rewards innuendo, insults, inaccuracies and baldfaced lies. He singlehandedly killed responsible journalism and is the Joseph Goebbels of this age.

Al Jazeera has more journalistic integrity than FAUX "news", and that's not even close to being a compliment or endorsement of Al Jazeera.


.

2007-01-05 06:55:54 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Personally, I find most of them amusing. Especially Michael Savage. I listen to them, it's always good to know where the opposition stands, and I often get a good laugh out of the ignorant comments that these people spew. Personally, I don't need a guru to tell me what to think, I am capable of researching and learning on my own. If the right needs someone to tell them what to think, well, I just feel sorry for them that they have to rely on those such as Rush the drug user.

2007-01-05 06:40:27 · answer #4 · answered by Faithnomore 2 · 0 2

Coulter

2007-01-05 06:35:12 · answer #5 · answered by Jessy 4 · 1 0

Coulter. But then again, I'd swear she's just doing a "Borat" on everyone.

There's more to her act than meets the eye I believe. She's very slick. Very!

I'm more bothered by the people who take her seriously.

2007-01-05 11:25:27 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

They all bother me. What bothers me more though is this Anti-Hate Bill I keep reading about. Apparently another push to get it through is going to happen this week effectively putting a stopper on free speech. (Anything inflammatory said about a minority etc will be considered a hate crime). To make matters worse Democrats are solidly behind this bill.

2007-01-05 06:53:38 · answer #7 · answered by Sun Spot 4 · 0 2

George Bush.

2007-01-05 06:48:19 · answer #8 · answered by Debra D 7 · 0 2

They are good for a laugh. I love it how they go to the White House for a photo op with Bush and then expect to be taken seriously. I preface all of their names with "comedian".

2007-01-05 06:46:39 · answer #9 · answered by Papa W 1 · 0 2

Rush.His audience is unmatched and they know it all to well.The republicans let us all down with their spending but I think they hurt Rush's numbers even more than the drug thing did.

2007-01-05 06:42:34 · answer #10 · answered by Tommy G. 5 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers