Using "data" as a plural word is getting more and more popular. Obviously, it's the plural version of the neuter past participle of the Latin verb dare. (Dare -> datum -> data). Actually - it could also be the fem. singular... lol.
That aside - I think "data are" sounds weird and does not work well with the concept. When I think of "data," it's an amorphous blob of information. *Not* datum 1, datum 2, etc.
Here are some examples that show how strange treating data as a plural is:
The data don't support this... Shucks, it don't?
There aren't enough data to support this... Wait! Here comes another one.
Did you see these data? Yes, I saw them.
Why can't we just treat the word as a singular < data sing. fem.? After all, that would match better information (which is fem!).
The people who treat data as plural don't know anything about Latin anyway - so why do we have to use this pretentious, awkward form?
2007-01-04
21:48:12
·
5 answers
·
asked by
evaniax
3
in
Education & Reference
➔ Words & Wordplay