The only way I would support this new Warrentless Mail search is if it is a matter of life or death, and even if the mail was opened, the Government must STILL show a judiciary body WHY they didn't have the time to request a warrant or that body of evidence would have to be thrown out. Listen, I personally have nothing to hide. (If the gov't could sort out my junk mail THAT would be a service) HOWEVER, where will the erosion of rights stop? We live in very scary times and I think our founding fathers would shed a tear for this country and if our founding fathers were alive today would explain that this country is on the path to tyranny.
2007-01-04 21:39:14
·
answer #1
·
answered by Kenneth C 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
collectively as I agree tax cuts or a stimulus for the human beings is mandatory, it incredibly is what might desire to have been carried out the 1st time. it is going to basically artwork if the government stops spending on each beef challenge commonplace to guy however. Tax cuts will strengthen the debt additionally, so might desire to be utilized in definitely stimulating, not this it incredibly is $12 and additionally you will possibly be able to pay it back at tax time. If the US greenback fails or loses it is top of the line score, it won't remember what share cuts they make, it will be too previous due.
2016-10-30 01:32:24
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Postal Vice President Tom Day said: "As has been the long-standing practice, first-class mail is protected from unreasonable search and seizure when in postal custody. Nothing in the Postal Accountability and Enhancement Act changes this protection. The president is not exerting any new authority."
Hardly warrantless.
2007-01-04 21:36:07
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Times have changed since 9/11 and there are no ways around this! If the government feels the need to do whatever it takes to prevent another horror like 9/11, I want them to do so. America is the country always helping the other countries and it's time to help ourselves, from another possible beating.
2007-01-04 23:39:57
·
answer #4
·
answered by tcbtoday123 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
The law on warrantless mail searches must be questioned and filed appropriately as unconstitutional because it is an intrusion into the privacy of persons and violative of the constitution.
2007-01-04 21:28:14
·
answer #5
·
answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7
·
4⤊
2⤋
Might as well wiretap, check mail, search who you talk to, tax for it, read your call logs, sell your criminal history, exploit your mental disorders, sell what meds you're on, victimize you for your assets, give tax cuts to those who are more fortunate, investigate the less fortunate, teach to hate opposing ideas, investigate those who oppose ideas, hate higher education for liberal thoughts... Wait.. Wait... What does Russia do?
2007-01-04 21:31:18
·
answer #6
·
answered by NONAME 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
I had posted a question about this earlier.
Got the expected responses.
2007-01-04 21:27:20
·
answer #7
·
answered by bettysdad 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
No way! Same with the phone tapping!
2007-01-04 21:33:40
·
answer #8
·
answered by Tweet 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
we just went through your mail and it seems your subscription to MAD is due for renewal.
2007-01-04 21:27:48
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Hell, what do I care if Bush reads my junk mail?
2007-01-04 21:36:48
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋