English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-01-04 21:21:25 · 13 answers · asked by Mr. Sir 5 in Arts & Humanities History

13 answers

Hi Sir,

I'll have to vote for FDR as well; but for different reasons. Before Roosevelt, Presidents really didn't do much. They presided over the government, but really took a back seat to Congress. FDR actually invented the modern presidency. He was the original "activist" who sought solutions for problems. He confronted the two greatest crises of the 20th century, the Great Depression and WW II, and sought ways out of these crises that have transformed the way people look at governement.

Before FDR, people believed that government could not (and should not) lead. Thus, when the Depression hit, President Hoover asked people in business to come up with solutions and volunteer to support his aims. This classical approach was a disaster. FDR, on the other hand, said that government was responsible for providing leadership in solving social problems; and it was the air of confident leadership he displayed that prevented the US from sliding into chaos and totalitarianism.

After Roosevelt, the American people were no longer content to give the presidency to someone based on credentials alone; they needed to know what the person was "going to do" once in office. After FDR, the people demanded activism. And this is true regardless of political party or ideology. Democrat or Republican, Liberal or Conservative -- nobody gets the presidency without a plan of action. And Roosevelt invented it.

He's been dead now for more than 60 years, and yet his shadow is still cast on the office. He left some very big shoes to fill; and everyone who's tried for the office since has tried to fill them.

Cheers, mate.

2007-01-04 21:55:39 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

there is little question that Europe, Canada and Jpan have concepts-blowing welfare courses. besides the certainty that those will improve into icnreasingly puzzling to maintain by technique of certainty the quantity or working persons decreases with teh organic and organic trend in inhabitants pyramids. one might desire to rgue that this could be offest by technique of immigration from poorer, better populus eu international places. besides the certainty that those migrants are generelyy not knowledgeable indoors the skill to hold the variety of severe paying interest had to shelter the large welfare structures. The components probable to be worst hit by technique of this are Japan and Germany. There are additionally matters over waiting circumstances in terms of receiving scientific help. besides the certainty that, even with that it is certianly better sensible than indoors the U. S.. Us voters won't initiate migrating to Europe indoors the subsequent 15 - 2 an prolonged time by technique of certainty the U. S. nonetheless has the stunning greater education device globally and a fierce publish grad interest marketplace. people who're employed many circumstances tend to stay in u.s. whoile commencing up out. until finally all business enterprise relocate, which isn't in all probability, or come to a variety u.s. is a moarket not acceptable properly worth having, migration out of the U. S. won't take place every time rapidly.

2016-12-15 16:10:33 · answer #2 · answered by miracle 4 · 0 0

Even though I'm an Australian, I can't go past Abraham Lincoln.

A great President and a great statesman.

I can never forget those immortal words in his Gettysburg Address: "government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth."

FDR comes a close 2nd. Thing is, I don't really like Freemasons.

2007-01-04 21:33:59 · answer #3 · answered by Ricardo 2 · 1 1

I believe FDR is ranked very high among all presidents, not just 20th century. He brought the country out of the depression, got the US into WWII, and inspired people throughout the world during the dark days of the war. Plus he served over 12 years, more than any other president. We now live in a country that is shaped by his actions and programs, mainly social ones.

2007-01-04 21:28:03 · answer #4 · answered by cjones1303 4 · 1 2

I would have to give it to FDR. Second and third to Bush then Reagan.

All three of them faced a great deal of opposition and proved in hindsight to be visionaries (Bush has yet to realize his "visionary" status, but it's only a matter of time.)

Just tonight I was pawing through the internet looking for "foiled terrorist plots" worldwide. I quit looking when I had a list of 88. My head was spinning and I hadn't put a dent in the volume of stories and links remaining.

It's no wonder the US hasn't had any other attacks. The job this administration has done is phenomenal.

(To be fair, some of the foiled plots I found took place during the Clinton years. The FBI had chalked up a large number on their own, and some of the legislation Clinton signed aided in his years as well as carrying over into our own.)

2007-01-04 21:40:23 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

I believe that Dwight D. Eisenhower was the best...simply because relatively very little happened during his tenure.

The country was getting along just fine, so he played a lot of golf and left well-enough alone. Other Presidents were always tinkering with something that wasn't broke.

2007-01-04 22:23:38 · answer #6 · answered by 4999_Basque 6 · 1 1

Clinton

2007-01-04 21:32:38 · answer #7 · answered by Natsif Alphamith 2 · 0 3

I 'm Australian and don't know much about past presidents but I can tell you who wpuld be the best America president ,Condeleeza Rice :)

2007-01-04 21:26:31 · answer #8 · answered by ANASTASIA_NIKOLAIEVNA_ROMANOVA 3 · 1 1

Reagan.

2007-01-04 21:32:41 · answer #9 · answered by AJ 4 · 1 1

ill. H.S. Truman

2007-01-05 00:15:58 · answer #10 · answered by Marvin R 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers