What do you think of the following feminist double standard (see below)?

Question

A woman passes by a house where a man is standing naked in front of a window. The man is declared an exhibitionist and would be arrested for indecent exposure.

Now let's switch the genders: a man passes by a house where a woman is standing naked in front of a window. The man is declared a peeping tom and would be arrested for invasion of privacy.

Do you agree with the feminist view that the man is guilty in both cases?

Answer 1

No I do not agree with the feminist hypocrisy.

Answer 2

Damn. If I passed a house and saw a man naked in the window I'd just laugh and give him the thumbs up. *lol* Only prudish, spinster types would report a guy for being naked in his own house. What kind of perverted woman would be looking into people's windows in the first place? As for the inverse situation, I'd suggest the woman learn to close her curtains or blinds or she deserves to be peeped at.

Seriously, what are the odds that the woman in either situation are feminists?? Those situations are highly hypothetical and seem unlikely to occur normally.

Answer 3

Well actually the woman would be an exhibitionit in the second senario. I highly doubt a man would be arrested as a peeping tom for walking past the house, trying to sneak up for a closer look is a different story and the person would be a peeping to in either case.
I am a feminist, a real feminist. Feminists never intended for men to be discriminated against or put down, they wanted every one to be equal. Man haters are not feminists even if they say they are.

Answer 4

Nope, I wouldn't agree that the woman is a victim. Lots of women love exposing their breasts, etc., for the simple reason of getting off on it in a certain way. I've been in many situations (not even counting Mardi Gras, where women exposing their breasts is the usual). But it isn't a feminist double standard. Feminists have nothing to do with it. Feminists don't give a crap whether women or men are exposing themselves in any situation, as long as it's their choice. It's only when men worm their way somehow into a situation where they can see the women without the woman's knowledge. And besides, if a man is inside his own house and naked, whether the blinds are open or are closed, he won't be charged with anything. It's only if he's out peeping into women's bedrooms (or other men's), that he would be charged. Anyone, you or I, can stand naked in front of an open window naked, and we can't be charged with anything. And if you are, call a lawyer. Trust me, you'll get off (no pun intended).

Answer 5

First of all, I don't know that that would necessarily come to pass. I've never heard of either of those cases existing in reality. If you know of cases where they have happened, let me know.
But on to your question. I agree that a man, or a woman, standing in front of an open window would be indecent exposure. If it's obvious that they are not trying to conceal their nakedness, then it's indecent exposure.
Therefore, whether it's the man or the woman who happens to see someone nude in front of an obviously open window, that I don't think would be an invasion of privacy.

Answer 6

not really because a woman standing naked in front of a window is also an exhibitionist. And whether a man is a peeping tom or not depends if he stops and watches, or keeps on going.

Answer 7

Amen to what Happy Bullet said. Feminists always try to explain away horrific behaviors by those who don the label of feminists as "extremists." They don't represent US, they say; we're the good ones! Even Christina Hoff-Sommers, whose work exposing feminist lies I greatly respect, refers to herself as an "equity feminist."

It reminds me of when I was younger. They were interviewing a woman from the Ku Klux Klan. She was trying to convince the reporter that the KKK wasn't about hating blacks. No, she says, it's about celebrating being white! And honestly, she may have actually believed that. She might have even considered black-hating KKK members to be a completely separate group, the "extremists."

But she would have been wrong. Even if you put a veneer of "equality" on the outside, it can't change what's on the inside. Feminists may say they don't hate men, that they're all for equality. And some of them may actually believe it. But watch their actions. Look at their responses.

You can't hide the truth forever.

Also, while I've never heard of the story happening above, I do remember a case where two women walked naked down the street. The judge found them not guilty of indecent exposure. There was some BS about how since their genitalia is "concealed" that it didn't count. Plus many indecent exposure laws are written for MEN ONLY, like the one mentioned in the source.

What say you, feminists?

Answer 8

the salary hollow exists for most causes, yet not discrimination,. heres an celebration. of each of the girls I went to school with very few studied finance or economics etc.. issues that could want to have entitled them to higher paying jobs. in addition they did not attempt to get internships contained in the summer that could want to have led to this kind of jobs. I had 3, and in each case really 10% of the applicants or a lot less were women human beings. the girls those who were occupation centred in the route of larger pay went on to get a similar jobs as their male opposite numbers, yet of that small p.c. maximum stop when you've married. In organizations like this it takes 20+ years to achieve your top earning potential, yet it truly is real of maximum fields. you should take a nearer look on the figures interior the figures. what positions, and how a lot adventure in each case. In organization and in company the final analysis is all that concerns. Thats the essence of any company. earnings first. If a women human beings is significant to a organization then she will be able to receives a fee what she advantages a lifeless ringer for a guy. advantages in a loose market economic device ;ike ours potential the most the market will furnish. The market does not understand the massive difference between adult women and men human beings.

Answer 9

their aren't many woman getting arrested for this anyways. But in a way you are right. We just don't hear about woman peeping on guys running around neighborhoods spying

Answer 10

Great question. Clear inconsistency based on feminists trying to demonise men's sexuality.

This is too obvious a double standard. At times when you catch feminists out like this they tend to attempt instead to shift the blame, for example:

* "That's not feminists that think that, it's RADICAL feminists, I'm not one of those.."

* "It's the legal system that enforces that, not feminists."

I've even seen things like:

"Men are to blame because they let feminists get those laws passed."

Actually a common one for me recently would be along the lines of:

"No! Those laws don't exist prove it!!#$@"

If you look at the actions of feminists rather than the words you see hundreds of fat angry feminists lobbying for both and creating the double standard without remorse.

Answer 11

I agree with the legal view wherein there was a law against public nudity which is constituted by standing naked in front of an uncovered window - so passersby have an unimpeded view of what you chose to display in said window - and the person choosing to display themselves was guilty.
Do I think you are guilty of not giving completely factual information and calling it a feminist view in order to cause angst, disharmony and aggression? Yes, yes I do

Since looking at your other questions I really have to say you are very bitter. Therapy would help you let go of alot of that anger against women. Generalizations are really unhealthy for you.